Add some pictures of the ladys and it would be flat outI guess this is all it takes to get some traffic 'round here in the summertime...a lil discussion about the EPA, stoves, and hotrods!
Graphs like this need to come with a disclaimer. Of course China and South Korea emissions are way up, they’ve both boomed from peasant agricultural economies to major world powers, over the last two decades. And of course our decrease is larger than other countries whose footprint was never but a small fraction of our own, to begin with.
Absolutely, but it is only fair to recognize that the newest 2015 regs have wet ink!
Selfish note. None of these, not even the kuma are clean enough or legal for my state.
Do have a link to what is legal or clean enough for your state? Thanks,
https://ecology.wa.gov/Air-Climate/Air-quality/Smoke-fire/wood-stove-info
This page has the information but the site won't let me click through to the list. There were a couple of boilers (garn, etc.) but no furnaces clean enough.
I'll keep looking. Seems WA likes to regulate based on GPH and the rest of the furnace world likes a different method.
Hey... stop trying to steer our thread away from hotrods and classic cars!https://ecology.wa.gov/Air-Climate/Air-quality/Smoke-fire/wood-stove-info
This page has the information but the site won't let me click through to the list. There were a couple of boilers (garn, etc.) but no furnaces clean enough.
I'll keep looking. Seems WA likes to regulate based on GPH and the rest of the furnace world likes a different method.
When using my phone I can click through and find only four wood fired furnaces meeting WA standards and the Kuma is not on the list. I don't know what it takes to be accepted but Kuma hasn't done it.
Hey... stop trying to steer our thread away from hotrods and classic cars!
I read the criteria and their approved list.
(broken link removed to https://ecology.wa.gov/DOE/files/1c/1cd08b6c-a609-4a70-b861-5d75a3ed547c.pdf)
We are much cleaner than any of them and are in the process of reaching out to make sure we get added to this. Unfortunate that we even have to do that when the list has been on the EPA site for nearly a year.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-04/usepa-certified-forced-air-furnace-list.xlsx
When mr lamp himself speaks up, in his thread, I am happy to momentarily get back on topic!
Looks like Washington does respect the wonky emissions rate per unit energy of the furnace world but maybe requires softwood?
What's really scary is that the FC1000 is on the WA. approved list! Anybody that followed that poor guys saga that bought one here this past winter knows what a scary, creosote makin, public health and fire hazard those things are!I read the criteria and their approved list.
(broken link removed to https://ecology.wa.gov/DOE/files/1c/1cd08b6c-a609-4a70-b861-5d75a3ed547c.pdf)
We are much cleaner than any of them and are in the process of reaching out to make sure we get added to this. Unfortunate that we even have to do that when the list has been on the EPA site for nearly a year.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-04/usepa-certified-forced-air-furnace-list.xlsx
What's really scary is that the FC1000 is on the WA. approved list! Anybody that followed that poor guys saga that bought one here this past winter knows what a scary, creosote makin, public health and fire hazard those things are!
What's really scary is that the FC1000 is on the WA. approved list! Anybody that followed that poor guys saga that bought one here this past winter knows what a scary, creosote makin, public health and fire hazard those things are!
I think I found the prototype FC1000 during the design phase.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.