So we then ask the obvious question, how many pounds of fuel are you putting into the firebox when all the ashes and coals have been removed. Calculate the total Btu's input, divide that by burn time and you will have a gross Btu's per hour production. (Less Btu's consumed to eliminate moisture content and multiply by 82.5% for higher value efficiency). The you will know how many Btu's the stove is actually producing.
There are plenty of anecdotal stories for supporting the ability of the stove, so if all the above works out, where are those Btu's going?
Next, some general observations. Smoke spillage could indicate plugged or starting to plug cap, chimney obstruction or in this case reduction in chimney size. Are there King's running on 7" class A straight up and out that have no issues, yes. Almost all in the coldest regions of Canada or Alaska. However, there are far more that try it and fail. This speaks to the ongoing point I post often...no two installs are identical.
Masonry chimneys often mean elbows. Insulated liners usually cure issues for masonry chimneys but not when they are reduced.
When I meet with dealers and their consumers say they are doing a basement install with a masonry chimney with less than 10" I.d., I urge them to consider installing a Princess. The 6" system would permit for an insulated liner, the peak and low end BTU differences are minimal and the likelihood of consumer bliss is nearly assured. However, some folks just want the biggest firebox. For those installations, I would always suggest that the installation criteria must then be met. The operators and owners manual is very explicit (as required by new NSPS) as to proper installation and operation.
One last comment, the dome of the combustor housing was not a retrofit to a prior model or version of the King 1107 or any other model. In order to provide the very deep belly (think ash/coal) carrying capacity, the door opening must be engineered upward. In 18 years, this is the first time I have heard this being either a criticism or performance issue.
I want to thank the OP for his patience, due diligence and willingness to explore making his investment worthwhile. I would suggest asking the dealer or a friend to loan the OP an IR Gun so that some valuable surface temp readings can be taken.
TREV, all these folks, BK owners or not are here to help. Their experiences cover dozens of stoves and combined, hundreds of years of experience. (This is not a shot at the old guys...because I'm one).
Your desire to meet with the dealer in person and express your concerns is the correct path.
Keep in mind that newer designed wood stoves are engineered to burn cleanly and some very efficiently, thereby losing very little heat up the stack. In your install, with such a long chimney, I will bet IR readings will show very low temps and support this. A insulated liner is the answer. It can also provide additional peace of mind. But not for your King application/chimney I.d.
The old pre EPA Blaze King stoves were MONSTER heaters that produced high emissions and had low efficiency. The only benefit of them was the heat production and heat loss up the stack.
I can't add any more, so please continue to post your data here and I will check back in a few days.
Again, thank you.
I have answered your numbered questions in my previous post, interspersed with the questions. I bolded them for maybe easier reading.
I would pretty much need a drilling rig to straddle my house to knock out the clay and install the liner as has been suggested to me. I was pondering whether the folks that suggest the likes of those renovations, are the same sort that think a 'minor' Kitchen reno is somewhere near a $100,000 job, or that a couple million bucks was a 'bargain', for a house that was being loaded into a dump truck with a grapple loader.
Makes for interesting TV, if you like that sort, but I don't have their money to spend, and likely wouldn't waste it on what they do, either.
With the old runt of a stove, once the chimney mass was warmed, it provided a pretty reasonable amount of the heat transfer in the uppermost and some into the Living room on the mainfloor. the rest of the heating system was designed around the use of the forced air furnace picking up and distributing the heat around the house living areas, with only the stairwell open to the basement otherwise.
I am surprised to hear that nobody before me has mentioned the impingement of the dome, in to the door line. While I appreciate the volume below the door, I have particularly begun to detest not being able to look down and being able to adjudge the size of the wood that will fit, from the door edge. The burn on my arm, while minor, is irritating, and came about as the coals were sloped rather higher in the back than front, allowing me to actually feel that I had the block of wood past the edge of the dome, and it wedged pretty good in my hurry to get it in and the door closed. Yeah, not so much, that...
To get down low enough to see in to fiddle a piece in, I have to kneel down on a pad, bend over and peer in, while swinging the door open and closed again with the other hand to try to deal with the smoke which pukes forth once fresh wood has been added onto hot coals. I will be clear once again, that I do not believe that any smoke is being sucked into my house, it is smoke from added fresh wood, which is not drawn up by the draft when the it flares.
I find that I am loading in less wood than I think I should be able to, as it seems rather a PITA to be eyeballing the gap and trying to split individual pieces of wood even further, so as to be able to place them in the gap. Especially, while on my knees and swinging the door. I figure about a three inch or so gap along the top of the load of wood to the dome, would be about typical. Will dig out a loop of cord and a scale, and start weighing in my wood over the next few days.
The more I look into this and learn, the more it looks like I am currently stuck with an appliance for which my residence is not and can not be adapted.
Even were I to blow out the thimble on the chimney and grind it out to an 8 inch (messy), it still is not going to be as per the recommendations. Seems a non-starter to me. Plugging the current thimble, and installing another higher up, doesn't seem much of a good use of time and money either, if there is not a VERY high confidence in it solving the issues at hand.
Thanks for your consideration.
Cheers
Trev