I’m arguing it’s not a failure point, at least for me. Mine stay so clean that my chimney guy doesn’t even have to go up on the roof to clean it, since I installed the Ashfords. I’m doing about 6 cords per year on the one stove burning 12-hour batches, and 3 cords on the other burning 24-hour batches.
Now as to why you would want one? I had a squirrel get into my Jotul within three months of opening that chimney. It caused me $650 in parts to repair the damage he had done, plus a month of lost time burning while I waited for Jotul to ship the parts, plus a full day of tearing down and rebuilding that stove. I’d give almost anything to avoid that hassle again, and the screens have caused me zero trouble.
When I say “screen”, I’m using 5/8” mesh expanded metal, not hardware cloth or window screen. If you’re clogging that, you must be burning very, very dirty!
Yes, Duravent makes both options. They need to offer options to those who burn dirty stoves, but I don’t see why anyone running a BK would need to resort to that, unless they’re in a place so cold they’re dealing with ice clogging the cap.
Now, knowing you put a lot of effort into burning clean, what’s the difference? Hardwood vs. softwood? King vs. Ashford? I really want to know!
Well you no longer have the Jotuls so there is no chance of a 650$ squirrel bill. Even without screens, the OEM duravent cap has bars that wouldn't allow a squirrel to enter. Or a seagull for that matter.
Since permanently eliminating the clogged screen problem by removing the screen, I don't have a screen problem so I won't be able to help you with an analysis of why some screens clog and some don't while using BK products.
If you have a recurring animal problem or a local code requirement then the screen may be necessary along with the possibility/likelihood of increased maintenance. If no recurring animal problem or local code requirement then having no screen guarantees that you won't have to clean your screen in a snowstorm, at night, and fall off the roof onto your head.