Darn, I always forget to remove that "1", when I use the exponential function. So, redoing the math, going from $1.00 to $2.53 in 23 years gives me 4.1%.
Or looking at your shorter period, of 14 years and 1 week, I get 7.3% annual increases. Of course, the 9 year period before that had 0.6% increases.
The point being wherever you take your starting point will have a huge effect upon your result, and looking at a 4.1% annual increase over the last 23 years doesn't seem nearly as intimidating as 171% over 14 years.
Yeah, I see where you are coming from. I ignored the first 9 years due to it being flatline except for the 1 spike. Thanks for your input.