Ok was going to ask this. So I usually follow your process then my cat crashes at 1000 when I shut the air and then I would open it back to try and maintain and hold the 1000. Sounds like I dont have to do this.
How can I tell the difference between crash and a stall? I always assumed this was the cat stalling out
Air all the way back?
Like the skid steer. I bet that's handy. I got my Kubota which is a great little machine but that skid steer looks like a real workhorse.
This explains so much. I think the vast majority of the problems people are having with cats are leaving the primary too high too long.the cats crashing when it dropps temperature stays in the active zone and rebounds.. examp.. cat starts at 1100... dropps to 750 and goes back to 1000 and stays there for hours and then dropps after offgassing to say 800 and slowly decrease .. this is over a period of hours.
Cat stalling is your in the active range like 1000 and it slowly dropps out of the active range.. this will happen in like an hour.. no rebound cat not lit off at all.. you can tell this is happening because you getting a 20 hour burn per load.. lol..
major creosote is being accumulated in the stove and pipe with cat stall..
For this low burn run, did you rake coals to the back?So last night I got the stove warm enough to obviously run, but didn't crank up draft ect.. my stove was roughly 500 and stovepipe probably 275/300ish. my cat was roughly 700.. I added wood like 3/4 large splits. Closed bypass right away waited for cat to shoot to 1000 degrees and turned the air all the way back.. the cat started to crash( which is expected) cat went down to 800 ish.. ( its ok if the cat crashes but not stall) Cat slowly combined back to 1000 and stayed there for a number of hours.. I finally went to bed and looked at the aubor on my way to the bedroom and cat was roughly 850 and burned throughout the night.. cat temps will drop as the wood offgasses and there is less fuel for the cat to burn.. woke up at 6am and that was what I have in the box
This is the advantage of the cat stove.. righ now my stove is still running with the air all the way back.. It will run all day today like this.. I added a little more wood when I came in from splitting.. cat is in the upper 600s
In my figuring and observations of the flexburns there's not a separate primary and secondary airflow so to speak. There is a second flap that opens up as the primary flap is closed down. This second flab pulls air in back of the combuster (not through it) and to the flue exit to prevent a general draft stall. At least in the Intrepid and I believe the Encore as well these flaps are connected to the same primary flow lever. By disconnecting the second flap chain should therefore increase the flow some both the combuster and the airwash system. So what this is saying is the airwash and combuster are in the same airflow set up. I may be wrong in all this but looking at the diagrams and the workings of these stoves this appears to be the case. None of this though is clearly shown in any schematics literature from VC. Maybe some this is proprietary? I wouldn't think so but who knows. I have disconnected that second flap from my Intrepid and the stove seems to act more controllable to me. But I have fabricated a knob whereby I can open it separately if desired. Not suggesting anyone else do this just what seems to work for me.Yeah I think for you guys with secondary bimetal control, as the secondary closes it will reduce the secondary air flow....obviously. But I suspect it actually increases the primary air flow at the same time because there are two streams in parallel. If the draft is a fixed pressure then closing off one of the parallel streams will increase flow in the other one. Seems to make some sense to me, it is shifting oxygen from the secondary to the primary.
Where I get mystified is how does this work with the 2n1 fixed restriction secondary...... baffles me.
That is definitely not how my defiant 2n1 model 1975 works. (and I am pretty sure the 2n1 encores are not like this either). I do not know the intrepid at all so I can't comment on that. In my experience the exploded parts diagram in the manual shows everything.In my figuring and observations of the flexburns there's not a separate primary and secondary airflow so to speak. There is a second flap that opens up as the primary flap is closed down. This second flab pulls air in back of the combuster (not through it) and to the flue exit to prevent a general draft stall. At least in the Intrepid and I believe the Encore as well these flaps are connected to the same primary flow lever. By disconnecting the second flap chain should therefore increase the flow some both the combuster and the airwash system. So what this is saying is the airwash and combuster are in the same airflow set up. I may be wrong in all this but looking at the diagrams and the workings of these stoves this appears to be the case. None of this though is clearly shown in any schematics literature from VC. Maybe some this is proprietary? I wouldn't think so but who knows. I have disconnected that second flap from my Intrepid and the stove seems to act more controllable to me. But I have fabricated a knob whereby I can open it separately if desired. Not suggesting anyone else do this just what seems to work for me
The body/size of the stoves are the same, but they run a little different the older encore picture 1.. has a lower burn and not quite as high of a burn as the 2024 and a lower efficiency rating
picture 2.. the 2040 has a high efficiency rating but the low burn is a little higher and the higher burn is a lot higher at 65k BTUs
picture 3 the 2040cat c.. has a slightly higher low burn then the other 2 previous stoves the higher burn is not as high as the original 2040 and the efficiency of the stove is higher than the 2 previous stoves but only 4% above the original 2040 in cat mode i believe
the original 2040 was changed to meet to 2000 emissions standards..
View attachment 307186 View attachment 307187 View attachment 307188
@Woodsplitter67 I’ll add to this list of differences that I also do not see the bimetallic secondary flap on the 2040-cat-c exploded parts diagram. I saw @gthomas785 had posted in another thread that the catC now had a fixed area secondary circuit. I haven’t checked to confirm this on my catC but that would be a huge difference I would think.
Back to the drawing board on understanding how these things work. I know you recommended just focusing on the two input levers and the fuel, but I can’t help myself.
A tale of two burns......For this low burn run, did you rake coals to the back?
I am trying to emulate this burn this morning, had a nice bed of coals from last night, cat was at 700, STT at 400. Raked the coals to the front to help clean the glass. Added 4 smaller splits, 100% air, engaged the cat right away and I lost it. Cat hung at 450 - 500, lots of smoke. I blocked the secondary off temporarily to raise cat temp, at 700 smoke went away and opened the secondary, stepped air down. Cat went to 1050, reduced air to 0%. Cat never crashed still climbing after 30 min, 1200 now.
Thinking my initial mistake was raking the coals to the front so it took too long to light the cat off, ended up with too much heat in the primary.
When your cat spiked at 1400 did you do anything? Or just let it fall?A tale of two burns......
This is pretty interesting. Today I was trying to duplicate low and slow as described by @Woodsplitter67 here:
Second burn:
- For all data my key damper was set to full closed, draft levels were 0.05 - 0.08 iwc and seemed to track flue gas temp as one would expect.
- I started by opening air up and burning down a coal bed from last night.
- At cat = 650 I raked coals to front (which I think was a mistake) and added 3 med splits, engaged cat, air = 100%
- Took a while for the cat to come up ( because I raked the coals to the front)
- At 1050 air went to full closed, cat climbed to 1400+, but then dropped to 1200.... I do not know why.
- Cat climbed up to 1600 at that point I started opening air and damper to get things to cool down.
- Finally load burned itself out and dropped.
Conclusions:
- Cat at 600, pushed coals to the back, loaded 2 med splits, air at 50%
- Cat hit 1000 pretty quick, air down to 10%.... no more adjustments for the rest of the burn.
- Cat dropped as described by @Woodsplitter67 and just cruised for several hours.
- At 15:00 cat temps launched..... I have no idea why. There were no changes.
- Anybody have a theory why cat would launch at the very end of a burn?
- Sitting now with a healthy bed of coals, ready to try again..... two in a row?
👎 Do not rake coals to front for low and slow. Takes too long to get cat hot again, lesson learned.
✅️ I was able to duplicate the low, slow burn when I raked coals to the back.
✅️ It is pretty impressive how long it burned at decent temps with very little wood. I feel like I got a lot of heat out of it for a long period of time.
✅ Glass was blackened from the first run but did not seem to get any worse after the second run.
✅ Checked for smoke several times and it appeared to be all steam and pretty light / whispy.
View attachment 307330
No inputs what so ever, before or after the spike.... Its like a middle finger. My stove has a bad attitude.When your cat spiked at 1400 did you do anything? Or just let it fall?
Haha yeah but that's a good burn. Spike to 1400 is perfectly fine. It threw off good heat?No inputs what so ever, before or after the spike.... Its like a middle finger. My stove has a bad attitude.
I do not think there is any concern with a short spike to 1400 like that. But what do I know.....
A tale of two burns......
This is pretty interesting. Today I was trying to duplicate low and slow as described by @Woodsplitter67 here:
Second burn:
- For all data my key damper was set to full closed, draft levels were 0.05 - 0.08 iwc and seemed to track flue gas temp as one would expect.
- I started by opening air up and burning down a coal bed from last night.
- At cat = 650 I raked coals to front (which I think was a mistake) and added 3 med splits, engaged cat, air = 100%
- Took a while for the cat to come up ( because I raked the coals to the front)
- At 1050 air went to full closed, cat climbed to 1400+, but then dropped to 1200.... I do not know why.
- Cat climbed up to 1600 at that point I started opening air and damper to get things to cool down.
- Finally load burned itself out and dropped.
Conclusions:
- Cat at 600, pushed coals to the back, loaded 2 med splits, air at 50%
- Cat hit 1000 pretty quick, air down to 10%.... no more adjustments for the rest of the burn.
- Cat dropped as described by @Woodsplitter67 and just cruised for several hours.
- At 15:00 cat temps launched..... I have no idea why. There were no changes.
- Anybody have a theory why cat would launch at the very end of a burn?
- Sitting now with a healthy bed of coals, ready to try again..... two in a row?
👎 Do not rake coals to front for low and slow. Takes too long to get cat hot again, lesson learned.
✅️ I was able to duplicate the low, slow burn when I raked coals to the back.
✅️ It is pretty impressive how long it burned at decent temps with very little wood. I feel like I got a lot of heat out of it for a long period of time.
✅ Glass was blackened from the first run but did not seem to get any worse after the second run.
✅ Checked for smoke several times and it appeared to be all steam and pretty light / whispy.
View attachment 307330
LOL I love your graph comments. "the middle finger"A tale of two burns......
This is pretty interesting. Today I was trying to duplicate low and slow as described by @Woodsplitter67 here:
Second burn:
- For all data my key damper was set to full closed, draft levels were 0.05 - 0.08 iwc and seemed to track flue gas temp as one would expect.
- I started by opening air up and burning down a coal bed from last night.
- At cat = 650 I raked coals to front (which I think was a mistake) and added 3 med splits, engaged cat, air = 100%
- Took a while for the cat to come up ( because I raked the coals to the front)
- At 1050 air went to full closed, cat climbed to 1400+, but then dropped to 1200.... I do not know why.
- Cat climbed up to 1600 at that point I started opening air and damper to get things to cool down.
- Finally load burned itself out and dropped.
Conclusions:
- Cat at 600, pushed coals to the back, loaded 2 med splits, air at 50%
- Cat hit 1000 pretty quick, air down to 10%.... no more adjustments for the rest of the burn.
- Cat dropped as described by @Woodsplitter67 and just cruised for several hours.
- At 15:00 cat temps launched..... I have no idea why. There were no changes.
- Anybody have a theory why cat would launch at the very end of a burn?
- Sitting now with a healthy bed of coals, ready to try again..... two in a row?
👎 Do not rake coals to front for low and slow. Takes too long to get cat hot again, lesson learned.
✅️ I was able to duplicate the low, slow burn when I raked coals to the back.
✅️ It is pretty impressive how long it burned at decent temps with very little wood. I feel like I got a lot of heat out of it for a long period of time.
✅ Glass was blackened from the first run but did not seem to get any worse after the second run.
✅ Checked for smoke several times and it appeared to be all steam and pretty light / whispy.
View attachment 307330
The BK King 40 brochure provides this explanation for a late burn catalyst spike:Ill be honest.. I cant see this happening at all, im not saying your doing something wrong with the equipment, maybe something is malfunctioning.. Realistically.. there is no way your stove can spike like that after 8 hours of burn and all the wood offgassed.. there is absolutely no fuel for the cat to consume at that point.. you enev stated if im correct that you were down to coals.. If you were.. theres nothing for the cat to run on..
The BK King 40 brochure provides this explanation for a late burn catalyst spike:
“Peaks result as the burning wood collapses, stirring up sparks and smoke, which is fuel for the combustor, and exposing unburned wood to the fire, resulting in rising firebox temperatures.”
IDK. Glad you were recording!
2 words..... demonic possessionIll be honest.. I cant see this happening at all, im not saying your doing something wrong with the equipment, maybe something is malfunctioning.. Realistically.. there is no way your stove can spike like that after 8 hours of burn and all the wood offgassed.. there is absolutely no fuel for the cat to consume at that point.. you enev stated if im correct that you were down to coals.. If you were.. theres nothing for the cat to run on..
I had very few coals and had to build heat before engaging cat.
Yep... at 12:30 I added a couple more splits on top of coals, engaged the cat and throttled air down as cat went to 1000.So by looking at the graph was that you adding wood a roughly 12.30 pm.. when the cat temp went up
I was under the impression that this was 1 load burning.. which it was such a head scratcher..
This is a good method. Replicated this last night. Cat performed fairly similarly. Loaded at 6:30 Cat at 590. Full load. Got up to 1000 cut the air. Cat dropped for 840. Fluctuated there for about an hour then went to 920 and stayed. Went to bed woke up at 430 Cat was at 400, stove top at 300 and I had a healthy bed of coals. Reloaded and right back to 1000. Cut it and off I wentA tale of two burns......
This is pretty interesting. Today I was trying to duplicate low and slow as described by @Woodsplitter67 here:
Second burn:
- For all data my key damper was set to full closed, draft levels were 0.05 - 0.08 iwc and seemed to track flue gas temp as one would expect.
- I started by opening air up and burning down a coal bed from last night.
- At cat = 650 I raked coals to front (which I think was a mistake) and added 3 med splits, engaged cat, air = 100%
- Took a while for the cat to come up ( because I raked the coals to the front)
- At 1050 air went to full closed, cat climbed to 1400+, but then dropped to 1200.... I do not know why.
- Cat climbed up to 1600 at that point I started opening air and damper to get things to cool down.
- Finally load burned itself out and dropped.
Conclusions:
- Cat at 600, pushed coals to the back, loaded 2 med splits, air at 50%
- Cat hit 1000 pretty quick, air down to 10%.... no more adjustments for the rest of the burn.
- Cat dropped as described by @Woodsplitter67 and just cruised for several hours.
- At 15:00 cat temps launched..... I have no idea why. There were no changes.
- Anybody have a theory why cat would launch at the very end of a burn?
- Sitting now with a healthy bed of coals, ready to try again..... two in a row?
👎 Do not rake coals to front for low and slow. Takes too long to get cat hot again, lesson learned.
✅️ I was able to duplicate the low, slow burn when I raked coals to the back.
✅️ It is pretty impressive how long it burned at decent temps with very little wood. I feel like I got a lot of heat out of it for a long period of time.
✅ Glass was blackened from the first run but did not seem to get any worse after the second run.
✅ Checked for smoke several times and it appeared to be all steam and pretty light / whispy.
View attachment 307330
This is a good method. Replicated this last night. Cat performed fairly similarly. Loaded at 6:30 Cat at 590. Full load. Got up to 1000 cut the air. Cat dropped for 840. Fluctuated there for about an hour then went to 920 and stayed. Went to bed woke up at 430 Cat was at 400, stove top at 300 and I had a healthy bed of coals. Reloaded and right back to 1000. Cut it and off I went
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.