WoodyIsGoody
Minister of Fire
Durafoil stainless combustors get to temp quicker, in half the time it takes for ceramic.
Ceramic, having greater mass, hold temp longer.
As I posted earlier, manufacturers must use in production the combustor that is used in certification testing.
Prior to May 16, 2015, there was an EPA rule, referred to as applicable determination, AD138. This AD sunset with expiration of old NSPS. It permitted a combustor manufacturer to test their proposed "new" combustor in a vintage Princess 1002 cat stove, referred to as the reference model.
If the "new" combustor achieved the same or better results as the original Corning combustor that the 1002 was tested with, your "new" combustor was deemed qualified.
That entitled the "new" combustor manufacturer to sell it to all cat stove manufacturers.
On behalf of all manufacturers, I worked with EPA to get an updated rule.
At the time of certification of a catalytic wood stove, you may now test a second combustor. The requirements are EXTREMELY difficult to pass and get qualified status, but we will test and pass!
Interesting.
Have you ever seen a "dual-layer" combustor? The upstream layer could have a mesh 4 times as large as the downstream layer. This could lead to faster light-off and control peak temperatures in the downstream section by partially burning the gases first.
Are all SS combustors basically the same? Or do some have different alloys used in the substrates, different methods of depositing the catalysts and different formulas for the coatings?
Thanks!