Bigger and than a King? Really?! That's called a furnace!Maybe they should offer a bigger one then.
Bigger and than a King? Really?! That's called a furnace!Maybe they should offer a bigger one then.
Dam. I couldn't imagine keeping up with that.
I was able to heat the house with a free standing non epa stove before switching to the King.Bigger and than a King? Really?! That's called a furnace!
Awesome! Why did you spend the money then?I was able to heat the house with a free standing non epa stove before switching to the King.
Because I expected to get the same amount of heat or more out of the King with improved burn times. Why else do people buy these things?Awesome! Why did you spend the money then?
Because I expected to get the same amount of heat or more out of the King with improved burn times. Why else do people buy these things?
That's exactly the experience that most everyone had when they switch. If not, there's something else going on behind the scenes that's not obvious or not disclosed. Wet wood, uninsulated/underinsulated walls or ceiling, Poor draft. All will play a part in this. The old stoves had no air regulation really, it was monitored but not metered really. Even on high they won't get away from you like the old ones did. They made crazy heat for short amounts of time, or ran real slow and made tons of smoke and creosote. The new stoves have engineering that prevent these and replace them with even dependable heat. Some drafty houses don't do well with the even heat release, or poor wood quality can play a roll in this as well.Because I expected to get the same amount of heat or more out of the King with improved burn times. Why else do people buy these things?
No not glowing red. It had a lot more surface area than the King does at that temperature. Even with a 650 or 700 degree temp it had the surface area to kick the heat out.Then 800 df that you are getting from this stove as you mentioned before is not enough? are you used to run the other one glowing red?
My old stove had a thermostatic air control. Same principal at the BK stoves.That's exactly the experience that most everyone had when they switch. If not, there's something else going on behind the scenes that's not obvious or not disclosed. Wet wood, uninsulated/underinsulated walls or ceiling, Poor draft. All will play a part in this. The old stoves had no air regulation really, it was monitored but not metered really. Even on high they won't get away from you like the old ones did. They made crazy heat for short amounts of time, or ran real slow and made tons of smoke and creosote. The new stoves have engineering that prevent these and replace them with even dependable heat. Some drafty houses don't do well with the even heat release, or poor wood quality can play a roll in this as well.
No not glowing red. It had a lot more surface area than the King does at that temperature.
The side sheilds and convection deck significantly reduce the radiative heating of the stove. Take a second look at the photos. The shields temperature is about 200-250F while the stove behind it range from 6-800F! Just a guess but there's probably 5 sqft of sheilds that is not letting that heat out where as my old stove doesn't have any shields. That's a significant amount of heat that is being blocked.At 800 df and running on high like you said it should no be much of differences. when you run it on high you have lots of flame inside that box and it will give you a larger area of radiation almost like any other stove. I know that side shields can restrict a little the radiation effect but not by much at that temp and the box engulfed in flames. I saw your thermal images when you posted them and i don't see much differences.
Blocked? Where's the heat going? Up the flue? Out the window? Heat is heat, it doesn't simply disappear does it?The side sheilds and convection deck significantly reduce the radiative heating of the stove. Take a second look at the photos. The shields temperature is about 200-250F while the stove behind it range from 6-800F! Just a guess but there's probably 5 sqft of sheilds that is not letting that heat out where as my old stove doesn't have any shields. That's a significant amount of heat that is being blocked.
The side sheilds and convection deck significantly reduce the radiative heating of the stove. Take a second look at the photos. The shields temperature is about 200-250F while the stove behind it range from 6-800F! Just a guess but there's probably 5 sqft of sheilds that is not letting that heat out where as my old stove doesn't have any shields. That's a significant amount of heat that is being blocked.
Crazy big heat! Biggest I've ever seen!Yah. I was thinking that didn't make much sense. I mean it's wood in x efficiency = btus output. Orrr something like that isn't it?
I'm curious to hear from others what sort of high output the king king puts out?
There are two primary methods of heat transfer from the stove, convective and radiation. Assuming the shields are 5 sqft area and have an average surface temperature of only 250F vs say the 600F of the stove behind it, the differences in heat radiation is significant and cannot be ignored. Combine that with no forced air over or between the side shields and you only have a natural convection from the side shields. The shields hold the heat in the firebox. That's what they do and their designed that way. I can hold my hand within 6-8 inches from the side of the stove while it's running on high. Without the sieilds I would not be able to.Blocked? Where's the heat going? Up the flue? Out the window? Heat is heat, it doesn't simply disappear does it?
Yah. I was thinking that didn't make much sense. I mean it's wood in x efficiency = btus output. Orrr something like that isn't it?
Just imaging how it would be without them.It's interesting. But hasn't been the case for me. My summit has shielding on it and it is literally a heat hammer, as I've mentioned before.
Just imaging how it would be without them.
The side sheilds and convection deck significantly reduce the radiative heating of the stove. Take a second look at the photos. The shields temperature is about 200-250F while the stove behind it range from 6-800F! Just a guess but there's probably 5 sqft of sheilds that is not letting that heat out where as my old stove doesn't have any shields. That's a significant amount of heat that is being blocked.
No doubt! See what that baby will do! The only difference you will see though may be imagined. The heat isn't being magically removed from your home. It may just be relative, warmer next to stove with your old one, now the whole house is warmer. But less radiant, more convective. Who knows, the heat isn't disappearing into thin air though.Why haven't you pulled the shields yet? I can't imagine you need them for CTC if you had the old stove in the same place.
The way it was explained to me by Chris was that the shields serve two purposes. First, they insulate the firebox to help maintain a high temperature combustion chamber to promote combustion efficiency. Second, they decrease the clearance to combustibles. In BK's eyes they are not to be removed.I know always there is something to learn and this is one of those times. I thought that the shield helps those ones with tight clearances but still giving you the heat out of the box just on different direction. the heat in blaze king with shields is redirect it up where it mixes with the heat from the top and at the same time the amount of heat is greater volume. more if you are using the fans. if not using the fan still radiating up. Other stoves with shields has opening pointing forward where the heat is redirect it into the room avoiding overheat walls and objects
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.