Apparently I do. I completely misread your post somehow I aplogizeI give up, you must have reading comprehension issues.
Apparently I do. I completely misread your post somehow I aplogizeI give up, you must have reading comprehension issues.
Meh, no worries here, it was getting late, I'm sure you were getting blurry eyed, and I was getting crabby, it happens.Apparently I do. I completely misread your post somehow I aplogize
I'm the OP, but in a quick scroll of my screen, I'm not seeing an option to add a poll at this point. Might be interesting to start a new thread, with the poll, and post a link to it here.Can we add a poll to this thread?
I'm curious to know how many members have how much (if any) post secondary education. Seems from reading this thread that many members have a degree of some kind.
But who will do all the jobs that require degrees but don't pay enough? We still need teachers nurses etc etc.It's amusing, but really a poor analogy, as this has nothing to do with being fair to those who already repaid their loans. It is about asking me, you, and every taxpayer to pay FUTURE taxes to cover the expense of these loans.
Again, go to school for any useless degree you choose. I don't really care if you chose a career that can't support the cost of your education. Just don't ask me to pay for your poor choices.
Economics tells us that, after some short-term pain, the situation will self-correct. With fewer people entering the field, employers must pay more to attract the available workers. Problem solved... eventually.But who will do all the jobs that require degrees but don't pay enough? We still need teachers nurses etc etc.
The problem with your reasoning is wages in general are to low compared to cost of education and cost of living. Leaving one job because it doesn't pay enough doest help unless there are higher paying options. In many areas there simply are not.Economics tells us that, after some short-term pain, the situation will self-correct. With fewer people entering the field, employers must pay more to attract the available workers. Problem solved... eventually.
And don't accuse me of over-simplifying the problem, I've been through the same in my field, both benefitting from and suffering from changes in supply and demand of engineers in my specialty.
Of course there are short-term problems with this, when applied to teachers and nurses. No one wants to deal with even a temporary shortage of 3rd grade teachers, when their Timmy is in 3rd grade. So, despite capitalism being the ultimate long-term wage optimizer, there always must be some degree of intervention in critical areas.
That said, history already tells us there will be no wage-based shortage of teachers. When wages were at their lowest, we had less of a teacher labor shortage than we do today. Working conditions, and not wages, appear to be the biggest national issue for this field.
2022 average starting salary for teachers in pa was still only $29171. Nurses have gone up dramatically in the last couple yearsAll true, but a different issue. You're looking at today's individual employee, I'm looking at the long-term problem, in aggregate. Both are valid issues.
The good news, to use your two examples of teachers and nurses, is that this is already happening. At least locally, starting salaries have really gone up substantially, in the last 1-2 years. Some local hospitals are offering signing bonuses commensurate with a full-year salary, cash on signing. Our local schools have gone thru massive staffing changes, so many older teachers taking early retirement and others just moving onto other careers, due to frustration with COVID responses and related issues. This has given more new graduates opportunities to get jobs in some of our better schools, where they would usually never have a chance, as recent graduates. Although more tightly controlled (unions / school boards) than other fields, I have also been told by some that the starting salaries of local teachers have been going up, in light of the labor shortages.
2022 average starting salary for teachers in pa was still only $29171. Nurses have gone up dramatically in the last couple years
That is low, but you know what they say about PA, "Philadelphia and Pittsburg, with Alabama in-between". Maybe consider moving an hour east? Our local public Pennyslvania school district has published their median teacher salary at over $97k, and average over $89k. The private school where my kids attend has even higher teacher salaries, so I am told by the teachers, but stat's on those aren't made public.2022 average starting salary for teachers in pa was still only $29171. Nurses have gone up dramatically in the last couple years
Median salary is not at all starting salary though. Starting salary in the city of Philadelphia is roughly $44000 but that's only part of the story. Starting wages there vary from low 20s to 60s. Clearly low income areas of the city are not going to be able to attract the best teachers because they can't afford to. So even before college a parents income is a pretty big determining factor in the quality of education kids get.That is low, but you know what they say about PA, "Philadelphia and Pittsburg, with Alabama in-between". Maybe consider moving an hour east? Our local public Pennyslvania school district has published their median teacher salary at over $97k, and average over $89k. The private school where my kids attend has even higher teacher salaries, so I am told by the teachers, but stat's on those aren't made public.
I guess we're getting pretty far from the point of repaying the money you agreed to borrow, but you bring up a complex issue that can't be simplified so easily. Studies in NJ have actually shown an inverse relationship between school budget per capita and student performance, exactly the opposite of what most would expect.So even before college a parents income is a pretty big determining factor in the quality of education kids get.
The first thing I saw is Finland's tax rate of 56.95%. Good luck with that.
Denmark 55.90%.
No it would not fly.
But the point is that a country values its people educated, or prefers their poorer people to remain uneducated. Which is the larger waste?
Moreover, the tax burden in these countries is governed not by education cost, but by social security (equivalent) costs.
Actually, they get a lot for the high taxes. By not spending the majority of these funds on the military they get some excellent benefits. There's a reason why Denmark is always among the top spots of the world’s happiest places. In addition to great education benefits, they also get at least 5 weeks paid leave a year, they have universal health care, a generous retirement pension, elderly home care, and 52 weeks paid leave for a new child split between both parents.The first thing I saw is Finland's tax rate of 56.95%. Good luck with that.
Denmark 55.90%.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.