that was the new one mines the older one 160kIs that all? My Morso is rated at 28k btu/hr nominal and 34k max. A quick Google search says the Clayton is rated up to 180k.
that was the new one mines the older one 160kIs that all? My Morso is rated at 28k btu/hr nominal and 34k max. A quick Google search says the Clayton is rated up to 180k.
Thats what the Lamppa's said they heat and way different waysCant compare ratings. Apples and oranges, no two measured the same.
Still doesn't add up. Rated max Kuma output per hour anyone?
That would imply during the burn the stove would actually be emitting much more than 45k btu/hr, being pretty much in line with any other stove of the same size. We all have to remember that the stove can only put out as much heat as the stove can hold. Firebox volume is the ultimate comparison tool.I've burned, on back to back to back days last January when it was well below zero.......206lbs, 206lbs and 190lbs of wood. Do the math how you like. I come up with AVERAGING ~45k BTU/hr/day. 1.1+ million BTU's per day.
I've burned, on back to back to back days last January when it was well below zero.......206lbs, 206lbs and 190lbs of wood. Do the math how you like. I come up with AVERAGING ~45k BTU/hr/day. 1.1+ million BTU's per day.
This does make one wonder about wood quality.According to the Clayton wood usage numbers the average loss is in the low 30's. It seems like he should be having no issue at these temps with a furnace capible of cranking out the mid 40's. Either something changed in the house or he is not getting near peak output.
Dale said 47 about right?I've burned, on back to back to back days last January when it was well below zero.......206lbs, 206lbs and 190lbs of wood. Do the math how you like. I come up with AVERAGING ~45k BTU/hr/day. 1.1+ million BTU's per day.
Its very big!! I'll post pictures of it. I use to crawl inside of it to change fire brick. I never used the whole fire box just 24 inches of it. My spliter is maxed out at 24! That's how big we are talking. The 1802g is the larger newer one. Mine is the 1800g.Well, according to Google the Clayton 1802g (I don't know which one Gary has, but that one is discontinued and calls for a 8" flue) has a firebox that's over twice the size of the VF100. So between the lower output/smaller firebox (even if it is more even and useful heat in the long run) and insulation issues, I think we can lay this to rest. Until this evening I didn't realize the Clayton was such a massive stove. 9 cords/winter makes a lot more sense when the firebox is 9 Cuft! I could burn my Morso for three days with one load for that beast.
Dale said 47 about right?
That would imply during the burn the stove would actually be emitting much more than 45k btu/hr
We all have to remember that the stove can only put out as much heat as the stove can hold.
Still, it has much more room for wood assuming you fit as much as you could in There. If I had a firebox like that I'd cut my wood to half the length of the box and double stack.Its very big!! I'll post pictures of it. I use to crawl inside of it to change fire brick. I never used the whole fire box just 24 inches of it. My spliter is maxed out at 24! That's how big we are talking. The 1802g is the larger newer one. Mine is the 1800g.
I agree.
QUOTE="SpaceBus, post: 2406473, member: 62498"]
We all have to remember that the stove can only put out as much heat as the stove can hold.
I could have but it was never necessary a round whell barrow was about what I put in every 12 to 8 hours depending on how cold it wasStill, it has much more room for wood assuming you fit as much as you could in There. If I had a firebox like that I'd cut my wood to half the length of the box and double stack.
While yes, I do agree, you can't argue with twice the volume.....and physically burn. Remember, the Kuuma is a bit different, as it just doesn't hang the primary air open. It keeps the burn regulated for whatever temp you have the computer set to; clean burning is priority numero uno.
I bet it is, and I don't dispute you. I'm just seeing now that there is now way the Kuuma could heat Gary's house without significant improvements to his house envelope.it is a very clean burn... you should see the inside of my firebox like the day it was built almost
I was telling the truth.... haha The clayton had a lot more power. Not sure how much but I know it was more...I bet it is, and I don't dispute you. I'm just seeing now that there is now way the Kuuma could heat Gary's house without significant improvements to his house envelope.
Hopefully the cumulative effect of the higher return air temp will get you "over the hump" while you improve the home envelope efficiency.On a positive note it's not that bad in here tonight... The VF100 is doing everything she can at the moment... I'll make the changes necessary to make it better. I want the house to be more efficient and dising the Clayton was the first step to that.
it should they say they heat houses bigger then mine even drafty ones accord to what I'm toldHopefully the cumulative effect of the higher return air temp will get you "over the hump" while you improve the home envelope efficiency.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.