Well, I must be filthy rich then , cause you could double or even triple minimum wage and I still wouldn't feel all that worried that I'm undercompensated..........
Getting closer to the point I was trying to make. Joful. What I'm taking away from this discussion is that many folks want to see every body make more money regardless of experience, work ethic or the economic climate in any particular spot on the map. So lets all just say we should all make the same amount of money. We all will go to work next week and make the exact same salary. Every one is all even Steven. Sounds like pure socialism to me and that I have a serious problem with. Or we could ramp up the scenario a knotch when the wage rate got to high and say that no one will any longer be paid for the work they perform. I will go to work for nothing producing widgets and the next guy goes to work for nothing making trinkets. When I need a trinket, I call him and he gives me a trinket. I pay him in widgets. Maybe he don't need a widget but if he wants to get rid of his trinkets that's the deal. We cant have it both ways. Higher wages mean higher costs for the goods and services we consume. Its that simple and I don't see how any one can see it any other way unless they have a perpetual motion machine hidden in their basement.I think that what a few here have been trying to point out is that falsely forcing up the bottom will not solve any problem. After some short term gain for those at the bottom, and some short-term pain for those at the top, the free market that put us where we are today will eventually set everything "right" again. As I see the salaries of those below me coming up, I'm going to be in my boss's office demanding more. Those with skills harder to replace will always have more pull than those closer to minimum wage.
Higher wages mean higher costs for the goods and services we consume. Its that simple and I don't see how any one can see it any other way
I think that what a few here have been trying to point out is that falsely forcing up the bottom will not solve any problem. After some short term gain for those at the bottom, and some short-term pain for those at the top, the free market that put us where we are today will eventually set everything "right" again. As I see the salaries of those below me coming up, I'm going to be in my boss's office demanding more. Those with skills harder to replace will always have more pull than those closer to minimum wage.
Sorry, I must have missed the memo. I didn't realize that Canada or any of it's inhabitants had any say so what so ever in the policy's of the U.S. This aint a personal bash but, just sayin.Which is a sign of a healthy, growing economy & that's a good thing or at least I was taught it was.
Winner of the race to the bottom gets what?
What is at the bottom that anyone would want to get there?, gotta be something real good if we are willing to exchange our standard of living for what the third world has.
No, but I can tell you what workers DO see, since you seem to be so out of touch.Nope you seem to be a pretty normal fellow. You just don't see those who earn less than you, getting more as being a threat to you!
Why should the unschooled, unskilled, make the same money as the guy who is required to train him?
[
Sorry, I must have missed the memo. I didn't realize that Canada or any of it's inhabitants had any say so what so ever in the policy's of the U.S. This aint a personal bash but, just sayin.
Maybe you are over compensated then?Well, I must be filthy rich then , cause you could double or even triple minimum wage and I still wouldn't feel all that worried that I'm undercompensated..........
No, but I can tell you what workers DO see, since you seem to be so out of touch.
People who have spent years, money, hard work and schooling, or years of experience, to master their trade or job, rightfully believe their knowledge and experience is worth more per hour then someone who walked in off the street , knowing nothing of the skills needed to perform that job,,,,they are correct.
Why should the unschooled, unskilled, make the same money as the guy who is required to train him? Of course they want more money when those unskilled workers approach their wages!
For you guys to deny that is just very close to lying, or just trolling. Minimum wage is pay for minimum skill,, not experienced people.
Yes, I just said that. 5 minutes later, I stand behind it. Around here, that is what 15hr would do to a lot of shopsWell to quote you "who said that", so far just you.
Don't you live in ohio? Lots of people make under 15 bucks an hour here. Lots of them...Well if you are the skilled master of your field and someone making 15 dollars an hour is a threat, there is a problem.
I saw you post hinting that your workers make 18 hr. And you spend thousands on them before they go to the job site. So if the experienced make 18, they won't think the new guy making 15 is too close to their wages?Well if you are the skilled master of your field and someone making 15 dollars an hour is a threat, there is a problem.
Frozen C,,,,,say something in French!FC probably cant read this, after all Canada speaks in French. ( insert sarcasm here)
I saw you post hinting that your workers make 18 hr. And you spend thousands on them before they go to the job site. So if the experienced make 18, they won't think the new guy making 15 is too close to their wages?
FC probably cant read this, after all Canada speaks in French. ( insert sarcasm here)
Yes, I just said that. 5 minutes later, I stand behind it. Around here, that is what 15hr would do to a lot of shops
That's the source of the issue, (I think) it's not that someone isn't worth $15/hr to start, it's that wages have been beaten down in a lot of sectors to the point where some/many are working for that same wage after they have been there awhile. So really the 15 isn't the problem, the beating down of wages is. Raising the minimum wage will have upward pressure on other wages & that's a good thing. So in time all above that 15 could expect a similar increase. Not right away but in time.
For some reason, you think there will be no consequences to just raising wages higher. Even the govt studies admit it will cause approx 500,000 jobs lost. Granted, I have slim confidence in govt to know anything,, but you lefties seem to love govt,,so why don't you believe them on this?That's the source of the issue, (I think) it's not that someone isn't worth $15/hr to start, it's that wages have been beaten down in a lot of sectors to the point where some/many are working for that same wage after they have been there awhile. So really the 15 isn't the problem, the beating down of wages is. Raising the minimum wage will have upward pressure on other wages & that's a good thing. So in time all above that 15 could expect a similar increase. Not right away but in time.
Even the govt studies admit it will cause approx 500,000 jobs lost.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.