Just replaced our primary kitchen refrigerator... again. This unit was a scant 25 months old when it died. It had a 12 month warranty, which I remember noting with displeasure at time of purchase, but it was literally the only unit locally stocked at the time, when our prior refrigerator had also died without notice. Twelve years in this house, and we are on our fourth kitchen refrigerator, whereas my mother still has and uses the refrigerator she bought for my childhood home more than 40 years ago.
In shopping for replacements, I found the same thing again, nothing in stock locally from any brand in any store, with a warranty longer than 12 months. Seems ridiculous that even the manufacturer has such low confidence in their product, to cut the warranty so short, but it's a clear example that people are not making their purchase decision on warranty nearly as much as up-front cost. In fact, it's not even easy to find the warranty info on most brand / store sites.
In talking with refrigeration specialists (related to my business), appliance repair people, and even salespeople in the appliance stores, it seems my recent experience is fairly common. The story I've gotten more than once is that at least one (if not "the") primary failure mechanism is the very low volume of refrigerant which these new refrigerators are allowed to carry, per EPA mandate. Decisions with regard to system design, and even the miniscule amount of refrigerant that can be lost prior to a catastrophic compressor failure, are both impacted by reductions in the total refrigerant load. This is a particular problem for those keeping a second refrigerator in an unconditioned space (eg, we have four collegiate-sized units in our garage), as these modern "low charge" refrigerators are more prone to failure in temperature extremes.
In any case, WRT this kitchen refrigerator, I'm not convinced that placing three kitchen refrigerators into a landfill is preferable to building refrigerators with a bit more refrigerant in them. I'd gladly pay 2x or 3x more up-front, for a refrigerator that will last me 15 -20 years, versus this frustrating cycle of replacing them every 2 - 6 years. As much as it flies in the face of my beloved free market, since the EPA has already stomped on that system, I wouldn't mind seeing a law requiring at least a 10 year warranty on all major home appliances. I think this would go a long way toward forcing design decisions that would ultimately reduce waste.
I'm finding that refrigerators are available with longer warranties, but if they're not available from stock when your current refrigerator dies, they're about as useless as tits on a bull. Most people don't have the luxury of waiting several weeks to receive their new refrigerator.
In shopping for replacements, I found the same thing again, nothing in stock locally from any brand in any store, with a warranty longer than 12 months. Seems ridiculous that even the manufacturer has such low confidence in their product, to cut the warranty so short, but it's a clear example that people are not making their purchase decision on warranty nearly as much as up-front cost. In fact, it's not even easy to find the warranty info on most brand / store sites.
In talking with refrigeration specialists (related to my business), appliance repair people, and even salespeople in the appliance stores, it seems my recent experience is fairly common. The story I've gotten more than once is that at least one (if not "the") primary failure mechanism is the very low volume of refrigerant which these new refrigerators are allowed to carry, per EPA mandate. Decisions with regard to system design, and even the miniscule amount of refrigerant that can be lost prior to a catastrophic compressor failure, are both impacted by reductions in the total refrigerant load. This is a particular problem for those keeping a second refrigerator in an unconditioned space (eg, we have four collegiate-sized units in our garage), as these modern "low charge" refrigerators are more prone to failure in temperature extremes.
In any case, WRT this kitchen refrigerator, I'm not convinced that placing three kitchen refrigerators into a landfill is preferable to building refrigerators with a bit more refrigerant in them. I'd gladly pay 2x or 3x more up-front, for a refrigerator that will last me 15 -20 years, versus this frustrating cycle of replacing them every 2 - 6 years. As much as it flies in the face of my beloved free market, since the EPA has already stomped on that system, I wouldn't mind seeing a law requiring at least a 10 year warranty on all major home appliances. I think this would go a long way toward forcing design decisions that would ultimately reduce waste.
I'm finding that refrigerators are available with longer warranties, but if they're not available from stock when your current refrigerator dies, they're about as useless as tits on a bull. Most people don't have the luxury of waiting several weeks to receive their new refrigerator.