I didn’t say they did. I was replying to a post that said Canadian nurses all make $90k to $100k. The average individual salary in the US was $31.1k in 2017, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. The claimed $90k - $100k rate of all Canadian nurses, the truth of which I actually doubt, would be 3x the average US annual income. That is what I said, but several people here seem to be incapable of not reading more into, or applying their own agenda to that simple statement.Nurses don't make anywhere near 3x the avererage US Salary, which would be around $150K in rough numbers. My Daughter is very satisfied with what she earns, and plans on continuing her education so she can earn more.
Each of the nurses in my direct family, are or have been relatively well-paid, as well. When I say relative, I mean the one with an MS is making nearly 3x the average US annual income with 25 years experience, and the one with the BS is making more than double the annual US income with about 13 years experience.I have two nieces that are nurses. One makes 6 figures. The other went into admin and does very well too. I have yet another niece that her daughter is a new nurse. She makes an hourly wage you wouldnt believe. I dont know what this poormouthing of nurses wages is all about.
Leveraging for higher income is not solely reserved for the destitute. We can find plenty of examples of wealthy people extorting their employers, customers, and patrons for higher income. I don’t think the fact that they were striking is proof if anything, one way or the other.I guess you should tell the nurses that went on strike here last year.
It's the difference in systems.....the USA and canadian system are much different. Here 90k/4weeks holidays IS the average for a nurse. Ashful why is it wrong to be paid well for this career? IIRC a USA health benefits cost on average 7500 per year, ours is roughly 9000 a year via your taxes. The difference in cost is outweighed by the amount the employees get paid. Remember if people earn more money, they spend and spread the money as well. Here teachers and fireman also make right around 90 to 100k. The system works well IMO, a good paying job is beneficial for the economy AND THE PERSON. Be happy for people doing well. As you have said there is alot of good jobs available, the more there are, the better.
Leveraging for higher income is not solely reserved for the destitute. We can find plenty of examples of wealthy people extorting their employers, customers, and patrons for higher income. I don’t think the fact that they were striking is proof if anything, one way or the other.
They sure looked wealthy to me, but they definitely left their rolexes at home that day.Leveraging for higher income is not solely reserved for the destitute. We can find plenty of examples of wealthy people extorting their employers, customers, and patrons for higher income. I don’t think the fact that they were striking is proof if anything, one way or the other.
First of all, I do our own taxes, since it became so easy under the tax reform act under President Trump. We don't come close to the itemized deductions, so the standard deduction is a no brainer for us.
Second, we pay for a higher level of health coverage, since my wife has some health issues. We do not need prior authorization to see a specialist. We also have a dear friend that holds a dual citizenship, both in Canada and the US, she chooses to have her health care performed in the US.
You misunderstood me, and perhaps I misunderstood you. All I’m saying is that the market determines the worth of a nurse, a doctor, an engineer, a gardener... anyone who is producing something. Here today, based on all of the combined factors of supply and demand, that worth is mid-$50k’s for inexperienced nurses out of school with an AS, to mid-$80k’s for an experienced nurse with an MS. My issue was the prior implication that all nurses were getting $90k to $100k per year, over the graduated and natural system we have today. After all, if the gap between MS and AS is so small, why would anyone put in that extra cost and effort for another 4 years of hellish school?Here 90k/4weeks holidays IS the average for a nurse. Ashful why is it wrong to be paid well for this career?
Interesting background, sodbuster. And yeah, I also catch myself sounding like begreen often enough that my family has sometimes accused me of being a closet liberal. He is a smart guy, and a wealth of information with a lot of excellent arguments, and not the only one here about whom that could be said.As a rule, I'm not big on unions, but in this case they need one. .. the nurses have no way to fight back. Meanwhile the CEO makes more every year, geez I sound like Begreen
True but when the insurance companies say we are only paying a given ammout that determines how much is left to pay nurses etc.I say it is a free market because it is not a monopoly. You can always change employers, just as with most other professions. Insurance companies do not employ the majority of nurses in this country, hospitals, private practices, clinics, and in-home services employ nurses and doctors. How those employers determine the ratio of pay between these two professions, as well as the others they employ in the course of doing their business, has absolutely nothing to do with the insurance companies handling payment between the patient and that employer.
Yes we did exceed all others for the reasons you stated. But that is slipping away quickly partly because of the fact that our middle class is struggling.You misunderstood me, and perhaps I misunderstood you. All I’m saying is that the market determines the worth of a nurse, a doctor, an engineer, a gardener... anyone who is producing something. Here today, based on all of the combined factors of supply and demand, that worth is mid-$50k’s for inexperienced nurses out of school with an AS, to mid-$80k’s for an experienced nurse with an MS. My issue was the prior implication that all nurses were getting $90k to $100k per year, over the graduated and natural system we have today. After all, if the gap between MS and AS is so small, why would anyone put in that extra cost and effort for another 4 years of hellish school?
But because you asked, my underlying philosophy is that we as a nation have exceeded all others in wealth and power because we allow the individual to excel in ways that other nations do not, whether it be those extra 4 years of nursing school to make 60% more than fellow nurses with an AS only, or any other chosen profession . I believe the “profit center” complaints about our healthcare system from folks like bholler, while made with the best and most sincere intentions, ignore the fact that those profit motives are the sole reason we are ahead of the rest of the world in most areas of medical research.
Interesting background, sodbuster. And yeah, I also catch myself sounding like begreen often enough that my family has sometimes accused me of being a closet liberal. He is a smart guy, and a wealth of information with a lot of excellent arguments, and not the only one here about whom that could be said.
What I enjoy most about everyone on this thread is that we can discuss these politically-entangled issues without becoming unnecessarily hostile, this is how folks learn, gather data, and form or change their opinions.
First of all, I do our own taxes, since it became so easy under the tax reform act under President Trump. We don't come close to the itemized deductions, so the standard deduction is a no brainer for us.
Second, we pay for a higher level of health coverage, since my wife has some health issues. We do not need prior authorization to see a specialist. We also have a dear friend that holds a dual citizenship, both in Canada and the US, she chooses to have her health care performed in the US.
A group of doctors invented health insurance I think. Employers started offering it to employees as a benefit and a way to keep and attract good employees. Employers took the initiative, not government.I don't know why healthcare got tied to your employment here. It makes no sense at all.
I didn't think the govt had anything to do with it to start. It just doesn't make any sense at all.A group of doctors invented health insurance I think. Employers started offering it to employees as a benefit and a way to keep and attract good employees. Employers took the initiative, not government.
I suspect those IRS numbers are taxable income after deductions.Avg. Salary numbers are all over the place and the Avg dont really tell you much. . According to the IRS US average self employed gross is 15 to 29k Avg Net is 13K . But estimates outside the IRS, the figure is closer to 60K.
I don't know why healthcare got tied to your employment here. It makes no sense at all.
After some research it looks like it started because of a wage cap put in place by the national war labor board. Because they couldn't offer more pay to attract the limited number of employees available they started offering other benifits.Unions
When I got out of the Corps in 1966 I had two choices of employment. USPS or City of Plainfield NJ. I chose the city because of the benefits. No union. After 5 years I went to Ma Bell again for the bennies, union this time tho I never joined. So that lure of benefits has been around for some time.After some research it looks like it started because of a wage cap put in place by the national war labor board. Because they couldn't offer more pay to attract the limited number of employees available they started offering other benifits.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.