You lost me on quote from steve's article. put in for bg monocrop comment?Your second paragraph in the quoted text.
You lost me on quote from steve's article. put in for bg monocrop comment?Your second paragraph in the quoted text.
This is an assumption that those conducting the logging will do it right.You lost me on quote from steve's article. put in for bg monocrop comment?
In the context with the lead in sentence. There are some bad actors yes. But if you are serious about your out in the open eco-sensitive business you are probably utilizing the stuff put out by univ. forestry depts. So, yes they probably are spending and it doing rt as a industry. Just info ,not in 2nd pp and not in quoted section, last pp. That is where you lost me!This is an assumption that those conducting the logging will do it right.
In the context with the lead in sentence. There are some bad actors yes. But if you are serious about your out in the open eco-sensitive business you are probably utilizing the stuff put out by univ. forestry depts. So, yes they probably are spending and it doing rt as a industry. Just info ,not in 2nd pp and not in quoted section, last pp. That is where you lost me!
my opinion, you have yours
Really?I would not think that most foresters look at their crop as a carbon sequestering business !
Unfortunately every act conducted by government has a human element, which means it has a political element, including those affected by the regulatory states. This is how Boeing managed to rush a flawed plane to market.In the context with the lead in sentence. There are some bad actors yes. But if you are serious about your out in the open eco-sensitive business you are probably utilizing the stuff put out by univ. forestry depts. So, yes they probably are spending and it doing rt as a industry. Just info ,not in 2nd pp and not in quoted section, last pp.
REALLY? WOULDN'T YOU? Your product grows on co2, faster than when co2 levels of the 50's -70's. So haeuser's a great company, they get all this waste energy and fit your great company, if even by default. wouldn't you use free energy bark, chips,saw dust, ect??? they now fit your great carbon sequester co because their product hits at the dreaded co2, which it grows on. let's forget they clear cut and only save money on a byproduct, where do they make money not reclaim or save it, but by growing, cutting , and processing trees.! My guess using space bus analogy of statements , you love your neighbor weyerhhaeuser. That is an eye opener!Really?
Unfortunately every act conducted by government has a human element, which means it has a political element, including those affected by the regulatory states. This is how Boeing managed to rush a flawed plane to market.
Yea it s not like Australia has endless forestland to spare. Pretty much a giant desert with forests around the edges which is where all the fires are. Nothing to burn in the interior except sand.Back on the Australia fires, the hot season still has months to go, so no wet period anytime soon. The videos from people at the beaches are horrible.
Yea i could have worded that a little better.If it gets hot enough for the sand to catch, we have real problems.
We might be seeing a new type of migrant.Their national capitol has had the worst city air quality in the world for several days running. Brush fires are predicted to go on for months. After this, I think the next big issue they are going to have is flooding when/if the fall and winter rains start. That and the loss of precious topsoil due to runoff. It's a pretty dire situation.
When I first saw that graph, the “fake news” skeptic in me wondered why only certain years were highlighted, as if points that didn’t support the narrative were suppressed. Of course, in this example that’s not the case, so I wonder why the author of that graph didn’t just use this more useful view:
It seems obvious the tipping point was reached long ago and this big ship is sailing full speed ahead ,so rather than dwell on the tipping point i think we should find ways to deal with the inevitable results. For the short term i wont be buying any beachfront property or any property in flood plains or fire zones.The question is not if we will reach the tipping point, but when.
Figuring out who, if anyone, shoulders the blame is not a default option. It is indeed the answer given by those spinning the narrative. They want you to think the exact cause is equally important to fixing the issue. Western, or perhaps all, philosophy places a great deal of importance on assigning blame.Obvious that change is happening, yes. But a very large fraction of the population is still either selling or buying the narrative that it isn’t, or that it’s just a natural process, not human-influenced. It would seem you need to solve that problem, before we can end the endless cycle of one administration repealing the actions of the prior.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.