Why the hate??? You are "protected" so why do you care if other people choose not to get vaxxed? Do you also hate people that smoke, because they are doing something that might affect theyre health? What about obese people. Do you hate them because theyre eating habits will be theyre early demise?
An important point. I'm not a hater, and I don't hate the unvaxxed, or smokers, or the overweight. At all.
People who smoke and are overweight are all well aware of the dangers. Let's put them aside.
We live in a society filled with **grifters**. People peddling misinformation for their own purposes, like getting famous or messing with people they don't like, but mostly just to make loads of money. Of course, there have always been grifters, and no political party or country has ever been free of it. They live in a legal gray area. It's perfectly legal to tell people (most) things that are not true. So if you can make a buck at it, go for it.
The internet and social media have been a huge boon to grifters. And the result is an explosion of grifting.
I happen to think that at this time one political party has a much bigger grifter problem than the other, in fact being infested by them. And that historically, the roles may have been reversed. But I am also certain that the current level of grift is not sustainable, and will naturally correct itself.
Now, there are grifters and there are 'marks'. If there are people who know that the vax is much less likely than covid to hurt them, and don't get vaxxed for whatever reason... I'm aok with them. Free country. But I think a lot of the unvaxxed are just marks. And a lot of grifters have made money and fame (and political success) making them marks. Why would I hate a mark?
I don't do hate. I can't even work up a proper hate on my ex-wife. Who certainly would deserve it. Trust me.
The people that piss me off? The middle men for grifters. That is a sweet business model. I don't even have to get my hands dirty making up misinformation, if I can make a percentage on the trafficking of it. Zuckerberg knows that his platform is ground zero for grifters doing their thing. But the grifters really rake in the eyeballs and the clicks, and he makes money on that. If he got rid of all the misinformation, it would seriously dent his bottom line. His content would look like the boring news from CNN or BBC, and he'd have no edge. So he will never do that.
But Zuck is an easy target. Fox is an easy target. The Russian troll farms are an easy target. And ofc all three feed each other.
But I think ALL the media is guilty. Journalism schools taught 'both-sides'-ism. They taught journalism was not about finding (or even assessing) the truth any more, just report both sides and let the readers decide. Easy! And guess what, both-sides journalism makes for better click-bait articles, and more reposted articles, compared to boring old restatements of scientifically or historically validated facts.
And so ALL media enables misinformation, and is in on the grift.
For the record, if I want to know what's true, I just go read wikipedia first.