In any case utility produced power is a bargain and very hard to reproduce for the price SO FAR. If solar gets much better or wind more commonly available that may change the dynamic.
I have Duquesne Light as my "normal" supplier. I just recently switched to IGS Energy, they had a 12 year lock on the rate, no cancellation fee. It seems like a good deal overall, but I haven't had it kick in yet as I only did it a month ago. I think my next bill should reflect it.
I wasn't able to find anyone else I knew that had done it, for comparison's sake, so I am hoping for the best!
Woodgeek,
I think the JCP&L customer charge is low, less than $5 and the delivery is about what you quote, I do recall buying delivered power from under 15 cents, maybe close to 14 cents per KWH, depends son what Constellation energy is charging... which is always ove 10 cents. A energy cost of 8.5 cents is the lowest I've seen, even from whatever energy (coal mostly I think).
I'll take a look at your source, thanks,
EDIT: I just looked closer, your source is "PA" not "NJ" a substitution of NJ didn't return anything and I bet there are no wind sources in NJ, unless they are offshore. As speculated above, no in my market.
From what I learned on this thread Wind is subsidized 2.2 cents per KWH, that's a big 20%+ and paid for by you know who: YOU. As for Solar, don't hold your breath. This is all more ethanol economics.
I'm all for clean energy and that's hydro and nuclear for now. JCP&L used to be about 50% nuclear.
Yep, and we decommissioned many more USA weapons than did the Russians, a policy we seem to still be following. More interesting might be how much of the bomb decommissioned stuff producing electric power is from Russia and how much from USA weapons. Whatever it cost us, better in our hands than on the world terrorist market. From the Iran news I have concluded weapons grade nuclear fuel takes more processing, so what has to be done to bring it back to industry grade fuel - and where did the stuff taken out go?
Thanks for pointing them out to me. Much better find than what comes up on the PApowerSwitch site, both for long-term fixed prices, and for 100% wind. Plus they claim taxes are already included in their price, unlike some of the competition.Looking for new green/wind options in PA, the portal is here: http://www.choosepawind.com/buy-pa-wind
Going over the options, I went with: (broken link removed to http://citizenpower.com/GEC/index.html) While the website makes them sound like dirty hippies...they were also the cheapest. My only choice is length of contract, I went with 24 mos since I can't be bothered to mess with this stuff too much.
The good news....my locked rate for 24 mo is 8.5 cents for 100% wind power (local, not REC). So my 'all in' will be 13.5 cents/kWh, or a whole cent cheaper than conventional PECO power. Since the phase out of my previous deal, my PECO Wind price has risen from 10 cents to 17.5 cents, so I will be saving 4 cents per kWh, or about $600 yr . Suppose I should have looked into this sooner .
In NY They started allowing outside Energy suppliers a few years ago and from what I have seen and heard so far no one SAVES much money by switching providers and it turns into a major hassle when you try to switch back. The local TV stations have done many news segments on the subject.
My latest bill from Met-ed has a "compare other supplier rate" at .089. Since we don't use a lot of electric, I've never even thought of looking. We've been here just over 10 years and have ony had an electric bill over $100 a few times, either really cold pre-stove months or really hot AC mobths. We are on a "fixed" plan $78 a month and every 3 months they review our bill and change it accordingly. Right now I pay $78 a month but only use about $55 so that extra money gets credited to my account and I can either leave it there, for higher months, like Summer when the AC is on, or get a refund. While this payment arrangement may not work for everyone, I don't mind it.
I never heard of them, just googled it. No thanks, India has taken enough jobs out if the US. Unless there is another Reliance Energy, they are based in Mumbai.We switched from Met-Ed at 0.089 to Reliance at 0.069. Took about 30 minutes on-line and we fixed the rate for 1 year.
Everything else is the same as before. Same billing,etc..
We just pay less for the same product/service.
Not many things in life go down in price !
I never heard of them, just googled it. No thanks, India has taken enough jobs out if the US. Unless there is another Reliance Energy, they are based in Mumbai.
Ok, just looked. you lucked out, not so much here.
The quote for my zip code is .879 for 12 months but that doesn't include the "distribution fees" that my current supplier will tack on to the bill for Reliant to use their infrastructure to get 3rd party electric to my house. Not sure what these fees are but being that close to what I'm paying now, it just doesn't seem worth it, especially since I'm sure after 12 months the "honey moon, thanks for switching" rate would go up so I'd be right back to looking around again.
It was worth a look though, thanks for sharing.
Ok, got my first electric bill that reflects my new contract. No surprises. PECO is charging me the same customer fee ($7.17 flat) and distribution fee (4.25 cents/kWh) as in my previous bill. Neglecting the customer fee, my price per kWh was 12.9 cents total in Jan, now it is 12.7. All as expected.
Feb is a high use month for me, 2700 kWh, so I saved a whopping $5.
But the new supplier is 100% PA wind, so I dropped the CO2 associated with last month's usage by >1 metric ton.
As for price trends, the 24 mo contract I took in Dec is now priced 0.1 cents cheaper....I could have saved $7.50 last month instead of $5!
The price to compare is .089 on my bill, so Without going back an looking at my bill, the Reliant .0879 rate, plus the distribution rate, which is a few cents, would mostly likely put me over what I pay now, so with Met-Ed I stayHM--the distribution rate from MetEd should be broken out on your current bill. It should also have a 'price to compare' on it to allow you to, um, compare the generation prices.
The price to compare is .089 on my bill, so Without going back an looking at my bill, the Reliant .0879 rate, plus the distribution rate, which is a few cents, would mostly likely put me over what I pay now, so with Met-Ed I stay
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.