lol... started typing a reply this afternoon, when there was not yet a reply, and look now! In any case, here were some random thoughts on the OP:
Some background info, i built a chalet about 8 yrs ago, r 22 in walls and 41 in ceiling. Its probably around 2800 sqft with the full basement included. My basement is set inside a hill and i have 2 garage doors that i wheel 2 huge garbage cans on wheel set them right next to my stove.
Very good insulation, smaller house, should do well with a stove. Of course, heating from a basement is always tough, unless the basement is superbly insulated from the earth surrounding it.
The stove does great till low teens then the electric heat pump will have to kick on to suppliment the rest... What i dont like about it is loading it 5 times a day with the fifth being at around 3 or 4 in the morning.
These two statements seem contradictory. Loading 5 times per day is not "doing great," by most estimations. Trouble is, the 30 has a reasonably large box already. If you're already running hard enough that you're ripping thru 3.0 cu.ft. of wood in 5 hours, then a Princess is not buying you anything. The advantage of the Princess is that it can be dialed down to a very low burn rate, but you're not even running the Englander at the low end of it's much more limited range. If you want longer stretches between reloads, at the same BTU output, you need a bigger box: BK King, Equinox 8000, etc.
Ash removal is very messy, usually do that every day or 2.
First, you do want to keep a decent ash bed in the floor of most stoves. Just 1" - 2", for most. Second, if you're removing ash that often, it's likely you're shoveling out more than just ash, and actually removing some material which has not yet been fully reduced / BTU-extracted.
And finally i thi k the catalyst would help keep more heat from going out of the chimney.
True-dat. However, the difference in efficiency between a cat stove and your Englander is not so dramatic as to take you down from 5 loads per day to 12 hour burn times. The Princes is posted at 81% HHV efficiency, probably where you'd be running it. What's the Englander's HHV?
With that being said, how do u guys and gals think the princess would do compared to the englander?
would the things i dont like about the englander be lessened by the desighn of the princess?
The BK is a whole other stove, with an enormous performance advantage for burning very low and slow, but I suspect you will not be making use of that advantage in your current configuration.
Tell us more about your basement insulation.