Hey guys been thinkin of gettin a truck and kinda been leaning towards either 1 a 2024 ford ranger or 2 a 2024 toyota tacoma .... which 1 do ya'll like ? Which do u think is more reliable ( for needing less repairs and what not )?
What sealed the sealed the deal?Just so u guys know i ended up goin with the 24 ranger
For whatever reason tues i just had ford ranger stuck in my headWhat sealed the sealed the deal?
SO far i think im lovin itI think the Ranger was a good choice. Personally I think it looks great in the redesign and the 2.3 Ecoboost motor has so far proven itself to be a good reliable motor. The F-150’s have gotten so big for my liking and if I went for a P/U it would be a Ranger. It’s a good size. I think you’ll enjoy it.
I see for 2024 there's an optional turbo V6. I'd think the 2.3L 4 turbo would be plenty enough power for the Ranger. Just need to hope the turbos will be as durable as past engines. That goes for Toyota too,
Those are air craft engine use cases, and there is a reason you don’t put auto engines in planes. Unless it’s an experimental and then a rotax from a snowmobile is good enough🤔I think they'll both be fine, the 2.3 has been fine in the Ranger and the Focus RS. The 2.7 is well proven in the F150. The 3.0 would lead me to do further research though.
Indmar even makes a marinized version of the 2.3 that was common in jetboats around here for a couple years, but that's pretty much stopped. A couple boats have had major issues, including throwing rods out the side of the block. It's a good engine, it was just not built to make 310hp at 19psi boost at 4800rpm for hours on end.
310 hp out of a 2.3 L is quite extreme. as well as a rod thrown through the block! I was wondering when mileage hits around 150k how that or any turbo engine typically hold up. The normally aspirated 2.3L engine routinely accomplished that and then some. Many diesels are turbos, but a different design in many ways.I think they'll both be fine, the 2.3 has been fine in the Ranger and the Focus RS. The 2.7 is well proven in the F150. The 3.0 would lead me to do further research though.
Indmar even makes a marinized version of the 2.3 that was common in jetboats around here for a couple years, but that's pretty much stopped. A couple boats have had major issues, including throwing rods out the side of the block. It's a good engine, it was just not built to make 310hp at 19psi boost at 4800rpm for hours on end.
310 hp out of a 2.3 L is quite extreme. as well as a rod thrown through the block! I was wondering when mileage hits around 150k how that or any turbo engine typically hold up. The normally aspirated 2.3L engine routinely accomplished that and then some. Many diesels are turbos, but a different design in many ways.
2.7L is a common truck 4 cylinder displacement. What I had in the Tacoma previously owned, as well as being available in full size GM half ton trucks. I'm not surprised mid sized trucks are making a comeback. Of course some never went away, like the Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier. Interesting the Frontier I believe, is only available with a normally aspirated 3.8L V6.
Those are air craft engine use cases, and there is a reason you don’t put auto engines in planes. Unless it’s an experimental and then a rotax from a snowmobile is good enough🤔
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.