I was thinking this 2014 Ram might be a flood truck. Was purchased last year. Would explain both the electrical issues and the rust.I'm really not sure what some folks do to their cars, but I wouldn't call their experience normal.
I was thinking this 2014 Ram might be a flood truck. Was purchased last year. Would explain both the electrical issues and the rust.I'm really not sure what some folks do to their cars, but I wouldn't call their experience normal.
I don’t think it is. In fact, the SRT’s report fewer reliability problems than the lower-HP Ram’s. If you’re within the design limits of the components, the increased HP is not going to have any first-order effect on reliability.It is about durability.
You know, I thought you had a good thought there, so I did some reading up on this. It turns out the SRT 6.4L makes more horsepower and torque at EVERY RPM, not just up high. Apparently, the main issue was getting the truck to run on 89 octane, whereas the SRT requires 92 octane.Yes but where in the rpm range are they making power? Trucks need low end power your car doesnt it works better with a more even power band.
Ok nevermind then i did no research just thought it would make sense.I don’t think it is. In fact, the SRT’s report fewer reliability problems than the lower-HP Ram’s. If you’re within the design limits of the components, the increased HP is not going to have any first-order effect on reliability.
You know, I thought you had a good thought there, so I did some reading up on this. It turns out the SRT 6.4L makes more horsepower and torque at EVERY RPM, not just up high. Apparently, the main issue was getting the truck to run on 89 octane, whereas the SRT requires 92 octane.
The SRT versions of that 6.4L Hemi run a compression ratio of 10.9:1, and the truck motor is dialed down to 10:1, and timing changed to allow it to run the lower octane fuel. This also resulted in a less-peaked HP curve, which creative marketing folks can call a “wider power band”, if you like. It’s really just making less HP and torque over the entire band, at all RPM.
Torque (lb-ft.):
Heavy truck 6.4L Hemi: 429 @ 4000 rpm
Light truck 6.4L Hemi: 429 @ 4000 rpm
SRT 6.4L Hemi: 475 @ 4100 rpm
I guess you could split hairs, and say the truck makes it’s maximum torque at an RPM just 2% lower than the car, but the car is actually making more than 429 lb-ft at 4000 RPM, too.
Power (hp):
Heavy truck 6.4L Hemi: 367 @ 4600 rpm
Light truck 6.4L Hemi: 410 @ 5600 rpm
SRT 6.4L Hemi: 485 @ 6100 rpm
Here, yes... obvious difference. In fact, I think the rev limiter on the trucks is set at 5800 rpm on the light truck version and 4660 rpm on the heavy truck version, so it’s just never going to build much horsepower (= torque * rpm / 5252).
I guess it mostly comes down to the almighty dollar, getting them to run on low-octane pump gas.
Not only is the engine a bit underpowered for towing, but also the braking system in a 3/4 ton truck is way better matched to be pulling and stopping 3 times the weight of the truck. 15000lbs total counting the weight of the truck. If i were towing 10000 lbs regularly i would want 400+Hp and a 3/4 ton platform with the bigger heavier braking system than the half ton models. I do realize the some half tons are rated to tow that much but the 3/4 ton truck would be a better choice if your going to be towing often IMO. Just yesterday i had to stop suddenly while carrying 1 ton of concrete blocks. Im not confident my half ton would have stopped as fast and avoided a collision with the car in front of me in the same situation.I personally feel the 5.3 Vortec is underpowered. My 2012 truck has had oil consumption since day one. GM says a quote of oil consumption per 3000 miles is "normal".
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
I personally feel the 5.3 Vortec is underpowered. My 2012 truck has had oil consumption since day one. GM says a quote of oil consumption per 3000 miles is "normal".
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Interesting, I also had the defector installed and they did some kind of engine cleaning. I disabled the AFM shortly after. Motor runs much better without AFM but still burns oil as "normal".Sorry a little off tangent....but similar story on oil consumption.
I have a 2011 Suburban. Started consuming oil at about 50k. Was told same thing, normal consumption is a quart or 2 every 2000 miles. I thought that was insane. Seems a little better but still too much.Started tracking it diligently. Brought it to dealer and they said yes they have some fixes. Some kind of filter in the oil pan stage 1 or something??kinda fuzzy on details now. Same issue. Then they put in a new oil pan deflector. So go back and forth with them. They want to see it every 1000 miles. still using too much.
Final time there , tech comes out and says it is low we are going to try a deflector. I said already has one, he said "oh" I said get manager he knows all about this truck. Manager comes out and says, yep Chevy had issue with late 2010 and early 11 engines. Going to get you new engine.
So at 90,000 miles I got new engine. Has 176,000 now and has had zero issues.
I probably already mentioned this, so sorry if it’s a repeat, I’m too lazy to go back and look. I was also a GM fan, and wasn’t thrilled with the idea of switching to Dodge, but I wanted manual trans on my 2005 pickup. At the time Dodge was the only maker still offering manual trans with a v8 and quad cab, so that forced my hand.Thanks everyone for your input. Still looking at options and I just put new tires on my Silverado so might run it through the winter before making a change. I have been a GM fan my whole life but something about these Hemi motors has me looking at them. Lots of friends and family has switched to Toyota, I can't to it though.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
My truck has been okay just not impressed with GMs quality these days especially for the price.
This my rig and dump trailer 2016 ram 2500 diesel, absolutely love itView attachment 232646
My since my dad retired he's put about 35k miles per year on his truck. He uses a GMC Sierra 3500 to pull a 40' fifth wheel trailer. He also splits time between a cabin on Lake Ontario and his house in PA during the summer. So the truck sees a ton of highway miles. He's gone through three of them since he bought his first in 2001. He admittedly loved the 2001 more than the other two, but he really disliked the 2010 and replaced it as soon as it was paid off (which is something he has never done before.)
His current model is a 2015 and its much better than the 2010. Better mileage, better ride, better fit and finish. I think that last generation (2007-2014) just wasn't the greatest. So, it may be worth taking a look at the newer offerings - anything 2015 or newer should be better.
Nice! You sure you don’t need a bigger drop on your hitch, though? Truck looks like it’s just about trying to lift the front axle of the trailer.
Its the way it was parked, got a 6" drop right now still have 2 more i can goI was thinking the same thing. Kinda thinking there might be a hill or drop in the driveway where the trailer is parked making it look that way ? Anyways nice set up
I think you're going to like it, I love mine. Offroad = posi rear? Did you upgrade to the 3.92? I didn't like the feel of the 3.23, drove too much like a CVT for my liking, so I went 3.92 posi rear.Update - purchased 2019 RAM 1500 today with 5.7 hemi. The truck drives and looks great. We will see how it holds up to my routine, off roading, pulling boats and atvs, hauling firewood, ect.View attachment 236944
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Thats for sure. Driving style and maintenance mean a lot. Iv seen people pound every vehicle they ever owned into the ground on a daily basis. Too many variables to consider. So im not sure if my GM trucks are bulletproof or if its that i just take good care of them plus have a reasonable driving style.But talk to 50 different truck owners and you'll get 50 different opinions about what is best.
It is your opinion and I respect that. I am a Ford guy, and also I am a Master tech for Chrysler. Work on a Dodge/Ram dealer but we own the three letters plus many inport letters. The owners own the town in the car market. I can get a good deal on any brand. The same you are saying i can say it from other brands and more about the one I work on it every day.I've owned around 65 vehicles over the years. Started with GMC and Chevy back in the day, tried a few Fords and Toyotas but will not buy any truck but a (Dodge) Ram now. I've owned five 2500's (4 gas, 1 diesel) and just like every other mechanical thing in existence, they will all eventually have some issue(s). 2500 and 3500 Dodge's are notorious for wearing out front end components (tie rod ends, ball joints, etc.) faster than other brands (especially if you use a plow) however I just prefer their trucks over anything else out there. The last Ford I bought was a new 2007 F250 4x4. I put 1500 miles on it and parked it until I could trade it in because it was such a piece of crap.
Currently running a '16 Ram Power Wagon and love it. Traded in my '05 Power Wagon just because I wanted something newer.
But talk to 50 different truck owners and you'll get 50 different opinions about what is best.
It is your opinion and I respect that. I am a Ford guy, and also I am a Master tech for Chrysler.
BTW, he is my gear.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.