Are they maple shaped leaves or maple leaves?gzecc said:Is it possible for an ash tree to have maple shape leaves?
Fair enough for me tulip it isLEES WOOD-CO said:I'll eat your wood grenade if it ain't TULIP !
Glacialhills said:Doesn't ash bark have a diamond pattern? hmmm.... 100% positive its...........wood of some kind. Only thing I am slightly positive about it is that its not walnut or cherry....or ash. Love how so many peeps here can be so positive identifying a split with some bark. Lets just keep these id's to what they really are; a good guess at best.
Hehehe . You FUNNY MAN It’s my JOB to know species If I doubted my guess I surely woundn’t eat anything but cake!
Glacialhills said:Hehehe . You FUNNY MAN It’s my JOB to know species If I doubted my guess I surely woundn’t eat anything but cake!
You do understand the difference between species and genus right? And that it just isn't possible to give a 100% positive species id by looking at bark alone. Genus maybe(and as these threads show even that is difficult for most) but not species. I am sure you r right on the tulip id. But I am just as sure that I could show you a bunch of different genus and pics of just bark and split would present exactly the same as each other. If species id is your job then you know that the only way to be 100% positive in species id (not saying genus id) is to have leaves, nodes, bark all working together to make the id. If you were correct, why dont field Identification books only need to show bark as positive species id.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.