Isaiah53
Member
I simply based it on a ratio of what I get from my BK versus what others get with the same stove burning hardwoods (15-18 hours versus 24-30). I believe the difference is almost entirely due to the heating value of my wood supply as I get very good turndown on my stove in terms of heat output. I would expect him to get about 60-70% of the burn time someone is getting using quality hardwoods. I think this generally lines up with his experience with the NC-30. I assumed an IS burn time of 12-14 hours based on what I have read here and on their website. If you can get 18-20 hours, then it would go up accordingly.I'm just curious why you think Blaze King will go 15-18 hours and the Ideal only 7-9? The Ideal Steel can burn just as low and slow as Blaze King. The only difference is Blaze King has a primary thermostat and Woodstock uses automatic catalyst air.
The Colorado Rockies are a much different environment from western Washington. You are typically burning standing or fallen dead wood that has been killed by beetles or drought and has likely been there for several years. Rarely do you get large freshly cut live trees. A 60 foot tall Douglas Fir is a tall tree in Colorado. I believe they grow to 150-200 ft in western Washington. The low humidity just seems to take a lot of the density out of the wood. I am amazed at how light it is when I carry it in, especially the pine. You simply cannot pack the stove with as much mass (weight) of wood.
Although I do think the BK would fit his needs, I am not trying to dissuade the OP from going with an IS. I am simply pointing out that he should not expect to get the same burn time others are reporting due to the nature of his wood supply, regardless of whatever stove he chooses.