There are only really 2 possible disadvantages or things to watch out for with piling the turbs to it. That I can think of.
One is that you don't want to lower flue temps down to close to a condensation point.
The other is that if you slow down exhaust flow too much, you might get into possibly decreasing combustion efficiency - they do have to breath good to get the oxygen in there and all mixed up and all that. In my case, too much turb hurts the draft that the fire sees.
I'm betting you'll see favorable results.
Can't do the floor thing?
Ordinary slant fin baseboard can do OK with somewhat lower temps if you put lots in. I do OK down to 130 or so. If that's a possibility. Might tuck under a window? Not sure how much room 'nearly to floor' leaves.
Now that is a fine looking piece. Glad to hear it has worked for your boiler, which by the way is another fine piece of equipment. Job well done @warno !I built my own for my rectangular heat exchanger in my boiler. I have 2 in the heat exchanger and it made a world of difference. I went from 600+° flue temps to averaging right under 400.
Here's the bigger of the 2
View attachment 221162
I was stunned how simple turbulators could be and still provide a serious increase in heat recovery from the boiler.
I took some 2" wide strips of 1/16" sheet metal (304 stainless in this case) and bent them into a zigzag so they had about 1/2" rattle space in the firetubes. This dropped my average exhaust temps down pretty nearly 100F, from about 450F to 350F.
If you have some heavy chain hanging around, that ought to work, too, and a lot easier. We're just trying to break up the laminar flow of hot gas up the middle of the tubes (and maybe slow the gasses down a little also).
I don't think it would be a good idea on a system without storage though. Things could get pretty gummy in there if it idles alot.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.