Hi folks...Newbie here.
Hoping to get a Tarm Solo very soon, but as you are all well aware the tank almost doubles the cost of setup, so my plan is to get by without it for as long as I can. I've read thru a lot of the archives and it seems an awful lot of folks start without a tank and end up getting one - I am wondering if there is anyone that doesn't have a tank, and is happy to keep it that way for the time being?
The tarm is roughly $7500, the tanks brings it close to $15,000 which is a huge incremental cost. What I don't know is if what percent of my oil I will save with just the boiler, versus the boiler with tank. I use about 1100 gallons of oil per year (thats with a wood stove already saving me 900 gallons). If the first $7500 investment saves me 90% of that oil cost, then that tank investment doesn't make a lot of sense...on the otherhand if the boiler-only solution saves me just 50% of my oil cost, and the boiler+tank saves me 100% of the oil, then the story becomes more compelling....anyone shade any light on this for me?
Also, I am really struggling with the in-the-house versus the in-the-woodshed choice. In either case, (if I get a tank), the tank would be in the basement. Question is, what is the difference in plumbing setup (assuming no tank) of an inside the house versus in the basement setup? Since the outside boiler would need anti-freeze, I assume the setup would be different.
last question for now - besides the cost of the boiler, what should I budget for miscellaneous parts (if I do it myself) or for parts and labor if I hire someone???
Thanks!
PS: Currently have an oil fired FHW with baseboards in the house and domestic hot water is directly off the oil-burner.
Hoping to get a Tarm Solo very soon, but as you are all well aware the tank almost doubles the cost of setup, so my plan is to get by without it for as long as I can. I've read thru a lot of the archives and it seems an awful lot of folks start without a tank and end up getting one - I am wondering if there is anyone that doesn't have a tank, and is happy to keep it that way for the time being?
The tarm is roughly $7500, the tanks brings it close to $15,000 which is a huge incremental cost. What I don't know is if what percent of my oil I will save with just the boiler, versus the boiler with tank. I use about 1100 gallons of oil per year (thats with a wood stove already saving me 900 gallons). If the first $7500 investment saves me 90% of that oil cost, then that tank investment doesn't make a lot of sense...on the otherhand if the boiler-only solution saves me just 50% of my oil cost, and the boiler+tank saves me 100% of the oil, then the story becomes more compelling....anyone shade any light on this for me?
Also, I am really struggling with the in-the-house versus the in-the-woodshed choice. In either case, (if I get a tank), the tank would be in the basement. Question is, what is the difference in plumbing setup (assuming no tank) of an inside the house versus in the basement setup? Since the outside boiler would need anti-freeze, I assume the setup would be different.
last question for now - besides the cost of the boiler, what should I budget for miscellaneous parts (if I do it myself) or for parts and labor if I hire someone???
Thanks!
PS: Currently have an oil fired FHW with baseboards in the house and domestic hot water is directly off the oil-burner.