Should I upgrade to catalyst insert?

  • Active since 1995, Hearth.com is THE place on the internet for free information and advice about wood stoves, pellet stoves and other energy saving equipment.

    We strive to provide opinions, articles, discussions and history related to Hearth Products and in a more general sense, energy issues.

    We promote the EFFICIENT, RESPONSIBLE, CLEAN and SAFE use of all fuels, whether renewable or fossil.
My bad
Then if he wants an 8" flue, go with the buck.
 
Last edited:
To bad they stopped making it but, the Kuma Sequoia would have been a contender if going 8" liner.

 
Sounds like the only options I have for what I am looking for would be a BK Princess or the Buck 91.
Can any of the hybrids run slow and low?
 
But the princess won't have an 8" flue, so if you want that, it's the buck
 
But the princess won't have an 8" flue, so if you want that, it's the buck
The fire box size difference is notable between the two.
 
Yes, that's why I compared it to the King earlier, missing the point that the OP wanted an insert.
 
@Gearhead660 I wanted to throw this out there, have you looked at the rear vent freestanding stoves from woodstock and jotul? Put it in front of your fireplace and get long slow burns from the woodstock. If your fireplace is big enough to fit a Buck 91 then you "should" be able to put a rear vent freestanding in front of the fireplace.


[Hearth.com] Should I upgrade to catalyst insert?
 
@Gearhead660 I wanted to throw this out there, have you looked at the rear vent freestanding stoves from woodstock and jotul? Put it in front of your fireplace and get long slow burns from the woodstock. If your fireplace is big enough to fit a Buck 91 then you "should" be able to put a rear vent freestanding in front of the fireplace.


[Hearth.com] Should I upgrade to catalyst insert?
Would love to do this, but it would take up too much room if I did. The fireplace has a hearth that sticks out about 15", and is around a foot off the floor.