Well, I've said it before, - the lab stuff is great from an "isn't that cool" factor, but it's totally over the top from a budget standpoint. Same deal seems to be the case with all the automotive guages folks have come up with. (which look suspiciously like they all come from the same manufacturer with different faceplates slapped on...)
What I'm thinking we need from a "form factor" and cost basis is something like those digital thermometers used for cooking roasts and such in the oven. Definitely not the highest tech solution, but I would say they represent the minimum ideal. They come with a nice display, a settable alarm, a package that would be reasonably easy to mount, last for ages on a battery, and can be had for under $10.00! The only things that would need changing to make them work as a stove thermometer would be a different probe and a change in the display calibration.
Now to build something fancier...
1. AC power (but possibly keep the batteries for backup) - wall warts are easy.
2. Add a few more inputs - two to four would be nice, much more than that would probably be overkill. When Elk and I were visiting the VC plant, it didn't look to me like they used more than a half dozen or so probes on their test stoves in the thermo lab.
Each probe ideally should have the ability to set 3-4 trigger points / zones - something like "cold, ideal, getting hot, and "OH $#!%"
3. The display should be big type - at least 1/2-3/4" high, an inch would be better. LCD or LED would be fine, LCD is better for power, but would need a backlight. If the unit had multiple sensors, I could see having either all of them displayed at the same time, or just one displayed with an indicator for which. However, I would rather have fewer sensors displayed with large numbers than all of them with small numbers - the idea is that you should be able to read the display from accross the room, easily.
4. It would also be nice if there was a set of status LED's or a color changing backlight to give a visible at a glance indicator of whether there was an alarm condition or not.
5. Alarms - There should be a LOUD, "snoozable", but not "cancelable" alarm that will trigger at a user configurable set point (per sensor) that says an overtemp condition exists. It is desireable to have additional alarm sounds, but these should be optional, and either "snoozeable" or "cancelable". These extra alarms might have several sounds, but they should be different from the overtemp alarm.
6. Communication - I would love to see some kind of interface on the box, I think Ethernet (cat5e) would be best for versatile hookup. Protocol should be standard, and the data format should be easily parsed without needing anything special on the other end. Specifically the box should be able to work with systems running Linux or any of the other less capable O/S's
I'd be really interested in a box like that, what would it be likely to cost? What sort of commitment would it take to get someone to build something like it?
Gooserider