maple1
Minister of Fire
To me,this is about the same as subsidizing solar.Help should come from family first,community next,and on up,not taxing everyone in the state for such programs.
But if they are there he should use them.
To me,this is about the same as subsidizing solar.Help should come from family first,community next,and on up,not taxing everyone in the state for such programs.
Yes,do to his age and medical condition,I agree.I just do not agree with the system.Yes,you are right.But if they are there he should use them.
If I were in your position, I would keep the Fisher (you don't mention the model i.e. baby bear, papa bear, grandpa bear), (I very seldom run the Englander at the same time as the Harman unless it is going to be below freezing for an extended period of time)
[
also it took some digging but I believe the Fisher is a papa bear
If I were you, I would buy two of the Englander 25-pdv pellet stoves. Each one can heat 2200 square feet and produce 48,0000 btu/hr. We've had ours for 5 years with zero issues. We live in the Northeast, burning two bags per day in the coldest weather. We burn 3 to 4 tons per winter. Yes, you have to make some minor mods to the burnpots to maximize air flow but that's easy. You can usually find these stoves on Craigslist for around $400.00 used. They are $1,499.00 new. The stoves pump out the heat in C mode. Check em out.
The OP was considering spending 1200 on a stove, and currently spends 650 on wood. He’s trying to save money. You’re suggesting he buy 2 stoves at 3000 and spend 1600 on pellets.. don’t understand your reasoning.
My thoughts are that if you have a free supply of wood and are healthy enough to do the work associated with it stay with wood.
If you have to buy wood, you may as well switch to pellets. No mess, easy to stack.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.