homebrewz said:
What do you think of the "bubble wrap" insulation for use on doors? It comes in a roll and is basically two sheets of a reflective material with a layer of strong bubble wrap (like used in packaging only stronger) in between. I was thinking of getting a roll for my cellar door.
yes bubble wrap is an improvement over plain plastic... I can't tell you if it is worth the extra money for the limited r-value it provides.
In the insulation industry a huge stake out is happening. the foam, fiberglas, celeuos, and bubble wrap, manufactures are compeeting agains one another. On the federal level
Energy codes want to increase r-value requirements. One purposed code, is to increase the duct insulation in unconditioned spaces from r 5,0 to r 8.0
The fiberglass contingent is all for this the bubble wrap dead against it as it would require double wrapping the ducts with a system air space to obtain r 8.0.
Even today single layer bubble wrap cost more than fiber glass but is so much easier to work with no itching required. the r8.0 would price bubble wrap out of the market.
each group has taken the others products and examined them to find flaws bubble wrap people pointer out that fiberglass foil face insulation looses it reflective value after a year due to normal dust and possible condensation attaching it to the foil surface. the same arguement are made that the instalation process is flawed wrapped to tight the fiberglass is compressed and reduces its r value then ther is the cost anyalsis is the increased r value cost effective? What did Owens corning and John Mansvile do? They paid a private certified ASTM-E lab to test the bubble wrap. It was discovered the stated R 4.2 per layer did not afford R4.2 but tested to R 1.1 They also discovered that the flame spread claims were woefully inagequate and the bubble wrap failed the cornor flame test
The battle is on going each manufacture is lobbying for codes to strenghten their market position I wittnessed this debate while attending our state code provisions adoption hearings. All flaws of all manufactures products were pointed out after sitting there one wonders if any of these products should be used and wonder where or how manufacture stamps or r-values are
One final ironic tid bit .The fiber glass industry was addressing the poly arguements. It seems the poly records it r value in 3/4 construction using 4" when the nonminal 2/4 is 3.5"
the poly wall R- values are inflated by 1/2" Poly industry counters the fiber glass rvalues ar flawed due to the application process, then the fiberglass industry point out application flaws of the polly and on and on it went. It got to the point nothing could be believed