A New Year's milestone. I went vegan on New Year's Day 2023, after going 'vegan before 6' a few months earlier. So two years now.
My original motivation was environmental... reading about the huge climate impacts of the dairy I ate, primarily, while posting here.
The three big vegan flavors are ethical, health, and environmental. Ofc you can check more than one box. I will not discuss the ethical side here.
The health factor for me has been HUGE. I feel 15 years younger than I did two years ago. I'm now 56 and have zero 'complaints of old age' and am 10 pounds lighter, eating as much as a I want. I am convinced that the high saturated fat in the Western Diet leads to systemic atherosclerosis. While clogging of coronary arteries gets a lot of attention, atherosclerosis is systemic through the whole body where it impairs the functions of all the organs. I believe that such clogging is a source of many age related complaints and a significant factor in many cases of dementia and organ failure.
It is certainly possible to have a healthy (nutritious and non atherogenic) diet with some meat and dairy/eggs in it, but for most folks the safe amount is probably 1/10th of what we typically eat or less. Some people can certainly do that, but I can't. Its like telling a lifelong smoker that they can smoke 2 cigarettes a day and be fine statistically (which is true). For me, its easier to just quit altogether. YMMV.
On the environmental side, the case is compelling. The easiest way to see that is visually.:
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/biomass-of-mammals/
Tallying up Earth's mammals (by mass, 2023 figures):
wild land mammals: 2.2 % of total
wild sea mammals: 3.6% of total
humans: 35% of total
livestock: 59% of total
Just our cattle weigh approximately 20x that of all wild land mammals! Most of those cattle live short lives, often being harvested in a tenth of their natural lifespan (2 years versus 20).
The situation with birds is similar, wild birds only make up 29% of the world's birds by mass. The rest are chickens (57%) and ducks/turkeys (14%). Farmed chickens are usually harvested in <60 days, versus a 5-10 year natural lifespan.
Of course part of these ratios is the destruction of wild habitat and overfishing, but the bigger factor is overshoot... the total mass of mammals and birds today is a multiple of what it was historically. Some estimate as much as 6X.
I'm personally a big fan of humans, and am glad that we had a Green Revolution so that the mass of humans could overshoot the natural productivity of the entire biosphere (which happened in the 1950s IIRC). But I don't see the need for all the livestock to make that overshoot factor 6 rather than 2.5 without them. Especially if what we are doing with them is mostly shortening our own lifespans and healthspans.
Just getting rid of cattle would free up enough land from producing their fodder that we could double the area of productive wild habitats on the earth.
My original motivation was environmental... reading about the huge climate impacts of the dairy I ate, primarily, while posting here.
The three big vegan flavors are ethical, health, and environmental. Ofc you can check more than one box. I will not discuss the ethical side here.
The health factor for me has been HUGE. I feel 15 years younger than I did two years ago. I'm now 56 and have zero 'complaints of old age' and am 10 pounds lighter, eating as much as a I want. I am convinced that the high saturated fat in the Western Diet leads to systemic atherosclerosis. While clogging of coronary arteries gets a lot of attention, atherosclerosis is systemic through the whole body where it impairs the functions of all the organs. I believe that such clogging is a source of many age related complaints and a significant factor in many cases of dementia and organ failure.
It is certainly possible to have a healthy (nutritious and non atherogenic) diet with some meat and dairy/eggs in it, but for most folks the safe amount is probably 1/10th of what we typically eat or less. Some people can certainly do that, but I can't. Its like telling a lifelong smoker that they can smoke 2 cigarettes a day and be fine statistically (which is true). For me, its easier to just quit altogether. YMMV.
On the environmental side, the case is compelling. The easiest way to see that is visually.:
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/biomass-of-mammals/
Tallying up Earth's mammals (by mass, 2023 figures):
wild land mammals: 2.2 % of total
wild sea mammals: 3.6% of total
humans: 35% of total
livestock: 59% of total
Just our cattle weigh approximately 20x that of all wild land mammals! Most of those cattle live short lives, often being harvested in a tenth of their natural lifespan (2 years versus 20).
The situation with birds is similar, wild birds only make up 29% of the world's birds by mass. The rest are chickens (57%) and ducks/turkeys (14%). Farmed chickens are usually harvested in <60 days, versus a 5-10 year natural lifespan.
Of course part of these ratios is the destruction of wild habitat and overfishing, but the bigger factor is overshoot... the total mass of mammals and birds today is a multiple of what it was historically. Some estimate as much as 6X.
I'm personally a big fan of humans, and am glad that we had a Green Revolution so that the mass of humans could overshoot the natural productivity of the entire biosphere (which happened in the 1950s IIRC). But I don't see the need for all the livestock to make that overshoot factor 6 rather than 2.5 without them. Especially if what we are doing with them is mostly shortening our own lifespans and healthspans.
Just getting rid of cattle would free up enough land from producing their fodder that we could double the area of productive wild habitats on the earth.
Last edited: