Agreed.Looking at a good wood furnace is not a terrible idea but many out there are not very good so do your research.
If it has take offs for ducts it is a furnace.Hey hogwildz,it's not a furnace,but they made it so you can run pipe from it to some floor registers to help bring up heat from basement
The [Woodstock] Ideal Steel has a cat that may need replacement about every 5 to 8 years (~$200).
J.a roby ultimate wood stove 3800sqft 25inch logs epa certified has a hook up to run two pipes like a furnace heats my stone uninsulated stone house with ease.it is in canada but withexchange rate around 1200 bucks i paid 1700 tax in on special vermontsnot to far
Yes, several. Other than Woodstock stoves they have not been mentioned due to budget constraints (>$2000) and an expressed dislike for cat stoves.So my next question is, is any epa cert stove have a cat convert on it?
As a freedom loving, EPA hatin' American, I too, was very hesitant to cave into buying anything the EPA had forced upon me. But I caved in and I can say that I LOVE my EPA certified stove/fireplace. It burns clean, it burns efficient (meaning I burn less wood for the same heat input to my home), and it can really put out the heat. Yes, initial cost is a bit higher, and it may take a bit more maintenance, but overall I'm satisfied.B holler thanks. Thanks to everyone. I just thought a non epa stove was the best. I grew up with non epa stoves. And they gave the heat. I guess it is time to look at diff things. The englander looks nice
Good deal. There is a learning curve with a new stove, especially when switching from a non-EPA stove to a modern one. But once you get it dialed in and adjust burning habits they heat great. When you get a chance can you add your stove (fireplace?) to your signature line? Is this the Kozy?As a freedom loving, EPA hatin' American, I too, was very hesitant to cave into buying anything the EPA had forced upon me. But I caved in and I can say that I LOVE my EPA certified stove/fireplace. It burns clean, it burns efficient (meaning I burn less wood for the same heat input to my home), and it can really put out the heat. Yes, initial cost is a bit higher, and it may take a bit more maintenance, but overall I'm satisfied.
Not necessarily. Most stoves fall below the 4.5 gm limit. That has been the WA state standard for awhile. The inexpensive 30NC is quite a clean burner at 1.6g/hr..
Yea my englander always puts out smoke maybe my wood ain't the driest but it smokes especially after reload.Do you think those stoves will pass if they ever use real cordwood vs the current test fuel.
Any stove is going to smoke some at startup or reload untill what ever the secondary combustion is gets up to operating temp. and the fact that your wood is not the driest will make it smoke more and for a longer period of timeYea my englander always puts out smoke maybe my wood ain't the driest but it smokes especially after reload.
I was talking about a furnace. No sense wasting time and money on a stove, when the job calls for a furnace.Hey hogwildz,it's not a furnace,but they made it so you can run pipe from it to some floor registers to help bring up heat from basement
Sometimes expectations can be lowered to meet the situation, as is my case. I set out four years ago to heat 100% with wood, having seen so many here do it, but have only managed a 50% reduction in use.I was talking about a furnace. No sense wasting time and money on a stove, when the job calls for a furnace.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.