Great point. I've never used a cat wood stove, so I have no reference, but I definitely like the Regency's triple burn.I live in a ponderosa forest, and burn lots of ponderosa.
The occasional hyper-resin-rich chunks produce tons of soot. Soot doesn't burn off at low temps and can overwhelm, snuff out, and plug up cats (in my experience). Soot burns off pretty good and passes through a cat without issue if it is first burned in the intense heat of rolling secondary flames under a baffle.
I would not burn ponderosa in a stove without "traditional" secondary combustion tubes to lay waste to the heavy soot laden chunks before passing through a catalytic combustor. I would not use a blaze king to burn this type of fuel. It's "garbage" fuel that I would expect needs a more "trash incinerator" approach to being burned off cleanly.
Given your application, I would take a look at the Regency F5200
Honestly, I'm probably going to hold of on the stove as I keep sorting out insulating and measuring gains/losses and best way to maintain the heat I keep in the house. I've been starting to use curtains in the lower level, that stick on shrink wrap on the skylight wells, etc. and it definitely makes a difference. The issue now is scale. To get curtains/ blinds/ whatever for the first floor will be a hundred feet or so? Plus the skylight bank (another 60+ feet. Without a cost efficient way to do that (spending 20k on the project doesn't make sense) it's either going to be creative engineering or slam the biggest baddest stove on the first floor and heat the whole 25 acres all the time! Ha.
So - this year it's insulating where I can, measuring losses and air movement to maximize efficiency while keeping costs low, then deciding what long term esthetic options there are to insulate. The house is far too architectural/ etc to put anything ugly up and so far the costs I'm seeing with motorized blinds, shutters, etc. makes no sense.