Yes, if I could achieve that in a tiny house on a regular basis I'd be pleased.okay. That's all fuel mass has been exhausted (weight back to zero).
So less than a pound per hour, pretty nice!
Yes, if I could achieve that in a tiny house on a regular basis I'd be pleased.okay. That's all fuel mass has been exhausted (weight back to zero).
So less than a pound per hour, pretty nice!
Though the actual burn rate will be higher as this less than 1 lbs per hour is averaged over the burn time, and extending that to the very last gram of fuel being consumed is a stretch.okay. That's all fuel mass has been exhausted (weight back to zero).
So less than a pound per hour, pretty nice!
I haven't read their marketing material, just the EPA reports for one or two models using a fixed fuel charge, not a full stove. It's the lowest output that the testing could achieve at the lowest air setting over the period of the test.Are you saying the minimum number mentioned by BK in their marketing the number is resulting from this same test?
I'm not sure how to reconcile that with having significant (but buried) coals a good 60 hrs after I started the fire.
Maybe the test using "no-ash" fir vs the wood I use...?
Please, and stick around for a full burn of cordwood lolOne of my local dealers (only 3 hours away) has the 602 v3 on the floor now. If I can find a day before the cows start calving I’ll make a day of it and go see how she burns.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.