Here's an update on my Jotul Rockland 550. If you're following this thread, I'm the guy who started it. Thanks for all of the comments and suggestions. I thought I'd offer some more thoughts. I'm now in my second season with my stove, and I'm happier with it, although I still have some reservations.
First, wood. As many folks mentioned, having properly dry, seasoned hardwood is essential for this stove. While the wood I burned last year would have worked well in my previous stove, the Jotul wants really dry wood. This year I'm burning wood I cut last winter, oak and hickory, split and stacked loosely, protected from rain, with good air flow and sun. We've had a drought summer and fall, and this wood is absolutely dry, and it burns well and hot.
I still have reservations about the overall amount of heat output. I know how hot this wood burns from previous experience with two previous freestanding stoves and a an insert, and how much heat it produces (when I open the door to put in more wood it's like opening a blast furnace!) And yet, I'm moderately disappointed with how much heat I actually get into the house. It is probably half the heat I got from my best freestanding stove based on the volume of wood burned. I understand that an insert will never be as efficient as a freestanding stove, but I can't help thinking I ought to be able to get more of that heat, or burn less wood to get the heat I do get.
The main culprit, as I see it, is the inadequate set of blowers. They just simply do not move a lot of air. They are small blowers set into a fairly large open space under the stove with no cowling to help direct airflow, and they are just not powerful enough. I'm guessing they move maybe 75 cfm each. I'm seriously considering replacing them with a pair of 135cfm blowers. I wonder if anyone has tried this or has a recommendation on this.
My other main reservation is the air control. First, why on earth is it just a tiny little metal post? I've burned my fingers on it many times, and it is just about impossible to make a small adjustment with it when the stove is hot. Why couldn't Jotul just put a little handle on it?
My other issue with the air control is the inability to restrict the airflow to the firebox as much as I would like. My chimney is 27' tall with a 6" SS liner. It gets a serious draft! As you may have seen, I installed a traditional flue damper just above the firebox outlet to help restrict the flow and reduce the draft, which helped a lot. However, even with the damper fully closed and the inlet airflow set to the far left, as little air as possible, I still get a rolling fire with lots of swirling, dancing flames. Pretty to look it, but inefficient for heat production and burn time. My stove burns up an entire load of dry oak and hickory in about four hours, burned down to coals. Not so great for overnight.
I would love to be able to further restrict the inlet airflow. Anyone have any thoughts on this? I think someone at one time mentioned an adjustment or modification that could be made to the inlet valve.
Anyway, my thoughts here in the second season are that this is a good stove, but not a great stove. I think the design has too much emphasis on style and attractiveness, including the look of the fire, and not enough emphasis on efficiency and heat production. If what you want is an attractive stove with a cheery fire in the evenings that will supplement your existing heat, this is a great stove for that. If what you want is a stove that will consistently, reliably, and efficiently heat your house as your primary heat source, day and night, you might want to look a little further.
First, wood. As many folks mentioned, having properly dry, seasoned hardwood is essential for this stove. While the wood I burned last year would have worked well in my previous stove, the Jotul wants really dry wood. This year I'm burning wood I cut last winter, oak and hickory, split and stacked loosely, protected from rain, with good air flow and sun. We've had a drought summer and fall, and this wood is absolutely dry, and it burns well and hot.
I still have reservations about the overall amount of heat output. I know how hot this wood burns from previous experience with two previous freestanding stoves and a an insert, and how much heat it produces (when I open the door to put in more wood it's like opening a blast furnace!) And yet, I'm moderately disappointed with how much heat I actually get into the house. It is probably half the heat I got from my best freestanding stove based on the volume of wood burned. I understand that an insert will never be as efficient as a freestanding stove, but I can't help thinking I ought to be able to get more of that heat, or burn less wood to get the heat I do get.
The main culprit, as I see it, is the inadequate set of blowers. They just simply do not move a lot of air. They are small blowers set into a fairly large open space under the stove with no cowling to help direct airflow, and they are just not powerful enough. I'm guessing they move maybe 75 cfm each. I'm seriously considering replacing them with a pair of 135cfm blowers. I wonder if anyone has tried this or has a recommendation on this.
My other main reservation is the air control. First, why on earth is it just a tiny little metal post? I've burned my fingers on it many times, and it is just about impossible to make a small adjustment with it when the stove is hot. Why couldn't Jotul just put a little handle on it?
My other issue with the air control is the inability to restrict the airflow to the firebox as much as I would like. My chimney is 27' tall with a 6" SS liner. It gets a serious draft! As you may have seen, I installed a traditional flue damper just above the firebox outlet to help restrict the flow and reduce the draft, which helped a lot. However, even with the damper fully closed and the inlet airflow set to the far left, as little air as possible, I still get a rolling fire with lots of swirling, dancing flames. Pretty to look it, but inefficient for heat production and burn time. My stove burns up an entire load of dry oak and hickory in about four hours, burned down to coals. Not so great for overnight.
I would love to be able to further restrict the inlet airflow. Anyone have any thoughts on this? I think someone at one time mentioned an adjustment or modification that could be made to the inlet valve.
Anyway, my thoughts here in the second season are that this is a good stove, but not a great stove. I think the design has too much emphasis on style and attractiveness, including the look of the fire, and not enough emphasis on efficiency and heat production. If what you want is an attractive stove with a cheery fire in the evenings that will supplement your existing heat, this is a great stove for that. If what you want is a stove that will consistently, reliably, and efficiently heat your house as your primary heat source, day and night, you might want to look a little further.
Last edited: