This remodeling was done with building permit, inspection of local municipality builder inspector. Fire Chief inspection and insurance agent inspector.
Jackpine
Jackpine
jackpine said:This remodeling was done with building permit, inspection of local municipality builder inspector. Fire Chief inspection and insurance agent inspector.
Jackpine
Gooserider said:jackpine said:This remodeling was done with building permit, inspection of local municipality builder inspector. Fire Chief inspection and insurance agent inspector.
Jackpine
No argument from me - as I said this was a topic that got somewhat hotly debated. :grrr: Elk, one of our former active members, who was one of the strongest in saying it was a hazard, is a building inspector in MA. While he said that he wouldn't pass such a setup, he also didn't seem able to point to a specific section of code that said it wasn't allowed - the only cites he gave seemed rather ambiguous at best.
I'm not going to take a position either way on what the code says, as I'm not sure, nor do I know what may have changed between these days and when you did your changes. I do think there is some logic to the idea that there is a potential hazard, and feel that it is worth mentioning when I see the subject come up as part of the Hearth's general position of promoting safe practices.
Gooserider
Yeah, I get it- close is probably good enough. So many odd sized piles here, I let my perfectionistic nature loose when I dragged my tape measure around last fall, and recorded all dimensions in inches. But it wasn't that difficult to convert to cubic feet later. You know, 3-4 cords is an impressive amount of cubic inches!Valhalla said:Clutter,
Round all your inches to the nearest foot. It will simplify your math.
For example, 29" X 34" X 59" would be 2' X 3' X 5' = 30 cubic feet.
Yes, Hearth.com is a great resource of information and a wonderful learning place.
Enjoy your stove and burn wisely.
I was also inspired by Pagey’s pic to use T-posts to help keep the rows nice and tidy. Not sure if I’ll get to the woodshed this year or not and, like everyone else, hate the tarps. I suppose you could run fence wire (american, chicken, etc.) around the outside of the t-posts and then secure the tarp on top (clips) /quote]
I don't have a picture unfortunately (as those stacks are almost gone) but I did what you mentioned this year, using T posts for support and using zip ties to attach plastic snow fence to support the stacks on the front and back and a thick plastic sheet on the top to keep the snow off.
Looking at Pagey's pictures though, I can tell I need to work on my stacking. I thought they were just supposed to stand up. I didn't realize they were supposed to be a work of art!
wendell said:I guess I'm not smart enough to use the quote feature correctly. Sorry to be off topic but wondering why my response got included in the quote.
...one thing I've found useful that I didn't see Pagey doing is to tie a rope between them about 3-4 feet up. Use a decent weather proof rope that won't stretch much (I tend to use ~1/4" poly rope, fairly strong and cheap) and tie it fairly snug across the top of the stack when you have it built up to the 3-4' level, (make the top as flat as you can) then keep on stacking on top of the rope, which will help to anchor it in place - this will help keep the T-posts from spreading under the load of the wood, and keeps you from needing to drive them in as deep.
Hard but not impossible.Gooserider said:It's hard to do an example since the software will insist on processing those tags... :long:wendell said:I guess I'm not smart enough to use the quote feature correctly. Sorry to be off topic but wondering why my response got included in the quote.
LLigetfa said:Hard but not impossible.Gooserider said:It's hard to do an example since the software will insist on processing those tags... :long:wendell said:I guess I'm not smart enough to use the quote feature correctly. Sorry to be off topic but wondering why my response got included in the quote.
Example:
[quote author="Gooserider" date="1233298287"]It's hard to do an example since the software will insist on processing those tags... :long:[/quote]
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.