BrotherBart said:Fod01 said:BrotherBart said:Two splits N/S with a quarter of a Super Cedar between them and one on top of them angled a little. Light the SC and close the door and go get a beer. And another. And another and three or four hours later reload on the coals.
For a cold stove, is that really enough? Wood I mean (sounds like you've got the beer covered). What about 'warming up the flue quickly...' and all that? My setup is an uninsulated liner in an external chimney. It drafts pretty well, but I think I would want more fuel lighting off quickly, rather than waiting for the splits to take off.
That would be a great method btw, as I'm always scrambling for kindling later in the season, and I just happen to have a box of SC in the garage ;-)
Gabe
Works a treat. If the flue is really cold use half of a SC. It will heat that flue right up while it is igniting the splits.
Yep, I use pine cones, usually White Pine- but just one of them. Remove from soaking in a large coffee can full of kerosene and shake off excess.bikerz said:I use pine cones. Put about 4 or 5 together in a pile and some small splits with larger on top of them and light.
I gathered some pine cones after reading about them in another post. They burn better than paper. I get srap wood from our school shop. Wax from old candles was a great help on warmer days when the flue was cold. Today was the first day cold enough to put a full load of wood in the stove. I keep the door open a crack. This really helps to push the fire to the back of the stove.bikerz said:I use pine cones. Put about 4 or 5 together in a pile and some small splits with larger on top of them and light.
pyper said:I've tried several times to take the exact same ingredient mix and turn it over for a top down fire and it's never worked for me.
From the standpoint of physics, bottom up seems to easily win the efficiency contest -- as the paper burns, it starts to heat the splits, but with top down the splits won't begin to warm until the fire burns down to them. My conclusion (based on the combination of experience and logic) is that top down necessarily involves a lot more kindling.
Since top down is going to use more kindling, I doubt that it's really all that much cleaner overall -- more kindling = more smoke.
Here's an experiment to demonstrate what I'm thinking:
Get a box of matches and a piece of paper. Light matches one by one, and hold them 1/2 inch under the paper. Count how many you need to light before the paper catches. Now repeat the experiment with the matches 1/2 inch above the paper. I'm guessing you use one with the first method and a whole box with the second. Bottom up makes use of convection, while top down "wastes" all the convection heat and uses primarily radiant heat.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.