No it is an old coal fireplace unit.Is that a Rumford fireplace?
No it is an old coal fireplace unit.Is that a Rumford fireplace?
Haha thank you, it's an old fashioned fireplace so it suits the house and would have probably had something like it originallyThat's a pretty burn, and fireplace! You think you are getting any net heat from it, or is the radiant heat into the room negated by the chimney pulling warm air out of the house? A fireplace for ambience is fine, especially if your main heat source is efficient and economical. I don't know what methods of heating they use there..oil, gas, electric? We have lots of dead trees here, and I don't mind the work, so wood it is..
I meant the one I replied to, not the OP's definite coal fireplace.No it is an old coal fireplace unit.
No thank you all for sticking with my definite daft newbie questions!!Thank you for staying with us on this question. The narrow holes in the bottom of the grate will clog with ash pretty quickly thereby reducing air flow to the bottom of the growing fire. Combined with no air holes in the rear, the fire will soon die down. All fires need fuel and oxygen.... period. Bellows were used to increase and disperse the oxygen flow to the combustion areas, thereby increasing the heat.
One idea might be to make or find a small grate that you can put in the existing hopper, but sitting perhaps an inch or so off the bottom. Kind of like a steam tray for vegetables in a pot of boiling water. This will allow some ash to fall but retain an air source below the burning logs and may sustain the fire longer.
Ahh I will look at thatI meant the one I replied to, not the OP's definite coal fireplace.
That is a modified Rumford box the side are not angled hard enough and it is to deep to be a true Rumford. It also has some very very serious clearance issues with the trimI meant the one I replied to, not the OP's definite coal fireplace.
Sorry, mine?That is a modified Rumford box the side are not angled hard enough and it is to deep to be a true Rumford. It also has some very very serious clearance issues with the trim
There is no need at all for anything additional. Yes some ash will probably build up in the bottom but that is a good think it will be somewhere for atleast a little bit of coal to be held. This will never Bevan efficient or long burning heater. But it is a beautiful price and as a decorative fireplace I think it is fantastic. And no bellows aren't needed either just dry wood.Thank you for staying with us on this question. The narrow holes in the bottom of the grate will clog with ash pretty quickly thereby reducing air flow to the bottom of the growing fire. Combined with no air holes in the rear, the fire will soon die down. All fires need fuel and oxygen.... period. Bellows were used to increase and disperse the oxygen flow to the combustion areas, thereby increasing the heat.
One idea might be to make or find a small grate that you can put in the existing hopper, but sitting perhaps an inch or so off the bottom. Kind of like a steam tray for vegetables in a pot of boiling water. This will allow some ash to fall but retain an air source below the burning logs and may sustain the fire longer.
No, the other photos posted from another user. My apologies for derailing things a bit.Sorry, mine?
It does look good.There is no need at all for anything additional. Yes some ash will probably build up in the bottom but that is a good think it will be somewhere for atleast a little bit of coal to be held. This will never Bevan efficient or long burning heater. But it is a beautiful price and as a decorative fireplace I think it is fantastic. And no bellows aren't needed either just dry wood.
Thank youThere is no need at all for anything additional. Yes some ash will probably build up in the bottom but that is a good think it will be somewhere for atleast a little bit of coal to be held. This will never Bevan efficient or long burning heater. But it is a beautiful price and as a decorative fireplace I think it is fantastic. And no bellows aren't needed either just dry wood.
I meant wood coals not actual coal.Thank you
Mine not the style that you American guys go for, too old fashioned?
In summary are you all telling me that my fireplace is designed for coal, not wood?
So whilst it is burning the wood well now (due to it being dry stuff, funnily enough haha..) it would burn coal all the better?
Congrats on getting your fire going. While in theory I don't think the coal cradle is ideal for wood--- if something works, then it works.Thank you
Mine not the style that you American guys go for, too old fashioned?
In summary are you all telling me that my fireplace is designed for coal, not wood?
So whilst it is burning the wood well now (due to it being dry stuff, funnily enough haha..) it would burn coal all the better?
Maybe it's the Scottish wind down the chimney!Congrats on getting your fire going. While in theory I don't think the coal cradle is ideal --- if something works, then it works.
To me there is nothing to old fashioned. Good interesting design is just that. It doesn't really matter when it was done.Thank you
Mine not the style that you American guys go for, too old fashioned?
In summary are you all telling me that my fireplace is designed for coal, not wood?
So whilst it is burning the wood well now (due to it being dry stuff, funnily enough haha..) it would burn coal all the better?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.