Warning, we are teetering on the precipice of a dangerously hot topic!
You're right, and maybe a topic many of us would like to pursue. BUT PLEASE NOT ON PART 7 OF MY GARN/WOOD GUN THREAD!

Warning, we are teetering on the precipice of a dangerously hot topic!
jebatty said:MC and transportation costs are the gorillas in the room for wood chips. Unmerchantable timber can be chipped at the logging site, which is economical, but then transportation to the user site gets prohibitive, as compared to the delivered cost of other fuels, at somewhere between 40-100 miles, depending on the local economics.
But what a "waste" to dry the chips using btu's from the combustion process or other energy than letting the sun and wind dry for free. I can only imagine how much worse the economics are when transportation to a drying site, handling, and the transportation to a user site are involved. In my area unmerchantable leftover from logging is either given without additional charge to the logger (built into the logger's bid price for the timber) or at a very small surcharge.
For residential use especially other issues are storage and freezing. High MC chips could become a hard, frozen mass when needed most.
jebatty said:Warning, we are teetering on the precipice of a dangerously hot topic!
You're right, and maybe a topic many of us would like to pursue. BUT PLEASE NOT ON PART 7 OF MY GARN/WOOD GUN THREAD!I would appreciate the Garn/Wood Gun threads to be mostly on topic. Thanks. Cheers.
jebatty said:I would support social costing of nearly everything. There is no free ride. The grim reaper waits ....
jebatty said:... I will disagree on the long term effect of fossil fuel contributed CO2 buildup ...
Jim, I hope I can ask of Dectra to clarify outputs of its boilers without sidetracking your thread. Frankly I'm shocked that what was a million btu boiler now puts out a continuous 500,000 btu. Mr Lunde? Randyjebatty said:The Garn specs show 700,000 btuH maximum output under specific conditions. The test burns last winter indicated on a continuous, not maximum, burn basis sustained output was in the region of 500,000 btuH.
[added] For my Tarm and based on 5 years of operation I use rule of thumb average output over a burn of 75% of maximum rated output, which for the Tarm is 140,000 x 75% = 105,000 btuH. This seems to also be about right for the Garn: 700,000 x 75% = 525,000 btuH.
bpirger said:FWIW Gasifier, I clean my Garn HX one a year....takes about an hour...couldn't really be any easier. Remove the "cover plate" from each HX tube and brush it out. I remove ashes from the firebox with a square point shovel....about once a month.
muncybob said:More questions for you Jim....I assume they have had to replace the fan bearing on the WG? How many cords did it last and was it a fairly easy job?
Como said:Seems an odd way of measuring it, loke servicing your truck depending on how many gallons of fuel you have used.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.