I just stumbled across this thread and found it strangely reassuring in the light of a topic of my own started several weeks ago - https://www.hearth.com/talk/threads/seriously-thinking-about-giving-up-on-burning-wood.149234/
The most recent posts in this thread, about the amount of wood drying space most folk (don't) have and the resultant need for kiln-dried wood are all exactly what we're facing here in the UK, since the (relatively recent, compared to you guys) practice of wood burning in stoves has grown rapidly here over the past five years or so.
More and more wood sellers here are setting up kilns for drying fire wood.. and yes, they are all fired by wood detritus... but it does make wood pretty expensive and so you tend to find that many wood burners over here either burn occasionally for ambience, or to suppliment central heating on the coldest nights, or becuase they really want to reduce their carbon footprint (that was my main reason.. And the fact I love wood . In short, wood burning over here is usually only a money-saving option for those few folk who are lucky enough to be able to CSS their own... and that's not many in the UK.
Where I'm seeing similarities in our two countries' positions is that there feels to me to be something ill thought out by both our governments. Over here people are being very, very actively encouraged to move from less Eco-friendly forms of heating to bio fuel, but the flaw in this, which is inevitably only discovered after one has invested in the shift to wood burning, is that it is incredibly difficult to find sellers who produce wood with a decent MC.. And that includes kiln dried.! As someone pointed out above, it takes at least a week for wood to get to 20% MC in a kiln and most producers try to cut their costs by heating faster and hotter, resulting in case-hardened splits that look great on the surface (literally!) with MCs of around 11-15%... Then you split the log and the MC at the core is close to 50%.
It sounds to me as though, on both sides of the water, we're soon going to be running into some sort of a wall created by ill-conceived short term thinking on the part of the EPA and our equivalent over here, DEFRA.
The most recent posts in this thread, about the amount of wood drying space most folk (don't) have and the resultant need for kiln-dried wood are all exactly what we're facing here in the UK, since the (relatively recent, compared to you guys) practice of wood burning in stoves has grown rapidly here over the past five years or so.
More and more wood sellers here are setting up kilns for drying fire wood.. and yes, they are all fired by wood detritus... but it does make wood pretty expensive and so you tend to find that many wood burners over here either burn occasionally for ambience, or to suppliment central heating on the coldest nights, or becuase they really want to reduce their carbon footprint (that was my main reason.. And the fact I love wood . In short, wood burning over here is usually only a money-saving option for those few folk who are lucky enough to be able to CSS their own... and that's not many in the UK.
Where I'm seeing similarities in our two countries' positions is that there feels to me to be something ill thought out by both our governments. Over here people are being very, very actively encouraged to move from less Eco-friendly forms of heating to bio fuel, but the flaw in this, which is inevitably only discovered after one has invested in the shift to wood burning, is that it is incredibly difficult to find sellers who produce wood with a decent MC.. And that includes kiln dried.! As someone pointed out above, it takes at least a week for wood to get to 20% MC in a kiln and most producers try to cut their costs by heating faster and hotter, resulting in case-hardened splits that look great on the surface (literally!) with MCs of around 11-15%... Then you split the log and the MC at the core is close to 50%.
It sounds to me as though, on both sides of the water, we're soon going to be running into some sort of a wall created by ill-conceived short term thinking on the part of the EPA and our equivalent over here, DEFRA.