Anybody who has worked with wood knows that not all woods are equal. They differ in more ways than density and moisture content. Some woods have such high mineral content that they quickly dull even carbide cutting tools. Others scorch at much lower temperatures than the rest, still others are so oily that finishes won't adhere to them. I would expect those properties to influence the burn properties of the wood as well.
I doubt that pellets are made from exotic spiecies of wood, but even the intrinsic property differences between Oak and Spruce should lead to different burn characteristics. They are really not made of the same stuff or, at the very least, not in the same proportions.
The caloric content is substantially the parameter that we buy pellets for. It is still not reasonable to say that BTU/$ is the only thing of importance. Differences in the cleanliness (dust and fines), resin and creosote production, ash content and residual ash are also important... at least they are to me.
Just my opinion. You are welcome to your own.
Well said, you've proved me wrong!! I don't do pellets. Hell, I should actually heat with electricity since it's so cheap around here. I just like wood heating and there's no source for pellets where I live so I went with a wood stove.
I do think most people heat with pellets to save money. So for me, most BTUs / $ are what would be important ( I even see threads on this forum about how the prices have risen). And calorimetry would help determine best BTU/ $. From what I understand about pellet stoves (and I could be wrong), some of the factors you mention have to do with the different makes/models of pellet stoves and the burn technologies involved (bottom feed, etc etc).
All that to say, with a woodstove, you've got softwood and hardwood. At the same MC, hardwood burns longer because they are more dense not matter what intrinsic properties you look at.
But I am looking into a pellet stove for my next move and it seems a lot more complicated that a wood stove...may still give it a try though.
Thanks!
Andrew