Looks like the EPA is on it - $215 wood shed plans
(broken link removed to http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/WoodShedDiagram.pdf)
(broken link removed to http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/WoodShedDiagram.pdf)
One cord?Looks like the EPA is on it - $215 wood shed plans
(broken link removed to http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/WoodShedDiagram.pdf)
I wonder what the new wood burning insert is going to look like? How to remove that particulate filter every couple of weeks? Catalytic converter? Or does that not help with particulates?
Stop worrying folks, no one is going to take your stove out of your burning hot hands.
You are there:Unless i missed it, i never seem to be on any list.
You are there:
Dell Point Technologies
before it was Paromax
It's right under-you have to purchase health insurance!Can someone point me to the section in the Constitution that says that the Federal Government shall have the authority to regulate how I heat my house.............
EXACTLY!It's right under-you have to purchase health insurance!
Can someone point me to the section in the Constitution that says that the Federal Government shall have the authority to regulate how I heat my house.............
It's right under-you have to purchase health insurance!
And you have to buy car insurance and homeowners insurance all laws passed by the government
Article one, section eight, clause eighteen.
I suspect the new Woodstock stove already meets the spec. The Lopi Cape Cod (freestander) too. No reason why that tech couldn't apply to an insert as well. So far no one is complaining about unusual maintenance requirements, but they are extolling the virtues of more heat.I wonder what the new wood burning insert is going to look like? How to remove that particulate filter every couple of weeks? Catalytic converter? Or does that not help with particulates?
Can someone point me to the section in the Constitution that says that the Federal Government shall have the authority to regulate how I heat my house.............
I suspect the new Woodstock stove already meets the spec
I was referring to the Ideal Steel. There will be plenty of new models, sizes and options if the new regs pass. The point is that this can be done with current tech. Regardless, no one is telling you to get rid of your current stove if that works well.
Looks like the EPA is on it - $215 wood shed plans
(broken link removed to http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/WoodShedDiagram.pdf)
The latest Fireplace Xtraordinair Hybrid, with tubes and cat, as someone posted, might already meet the bill. Tubes and Cats de rigueur in future?I suspect the new Woodstock stove already meets the spec. The Lopi Cape Cod (freestander) too. No reason why that tech couldn't apply to an insert as well. So far no one is complaining about unusual maintenance requirements, but they are extolling the virtues of more heat.
I have to say it was darned impressive in DC at the decathlon to see 8 chimneys all with no indication of smoke and no smoke smell downwind. This is with current technology.
Here is the clause that BrotherBart is talking about : "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Just posted this on another thread but it fits you too. 85,000 btu's should keep you warm! >I have the CFM-FW240007. It is a little to small when the temperature drops below 35F in my 1320 square feet home. And I hate reloading every 4 hours that is why I need to upgrade to a 2cf stove if I can find the right stove at the right price for my needs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.