I hate to say it but your EKO 40 is going to be severly undersized if you hit 80,000+ btu/hr with any consistency and aren't planning to run it 24/7 forever. Any idea how many "design load days" you expect in a heating season? You may want to consider a 60 or even an 80 if storage is in your future.
For reference a full load of wood will only last 4 hours +/- when an EKO is running full bore, peak output. And rarely, very rarely, will any boilers acheive their advertised output during an entire burn. So let's say your EKO 40 is outputting 100,000 btu for round numbers, and needs to be loaded every 4 hours to sustain this output. Do you think you'll ever have enough heat to charge your future tanks with only 20k to spare +/-? Probably not. And I'm sure you don't want to be loading that gem every 4 or 5 hours no matter what the conditions.
I think if you're seriously planning for storage you may want to consider an EKO 60. My opinion only...
For reference a full load of wood will only last 4 hours +/- when an EKO is running full bore, peak output. And rarely, very rarely, will any boilers acheive their advertised output during an entire burn. So let's say your EKO 40 is outputting 100,000 btu for round numbers, and needs to be loaded every 4 hours to sustain this output. Do you think you'll ever have enough heat to charge your future tanks with only 20k to spare +/-? Probably not. And I'm sure you don't want to be loading that gem every 4 or 5 hours no matter what the conditions.
I think if you're seriously planning for storage you may want to consider an EKO 60. My opinion only...