I skimmed through your post as I'm watching the hockey game right now, but if I understand correctly you assumed that all heat you put into the house was due to infiltration your air changes per hour will be inflated as you are ignoring the large amount of heat lost due to conduction through wall/ceiling/windows/etc.
So your actual infiltration rate will actually be a fair bit lower than what you calculated.
Correct. The calculations ignore both conductive heat loss and solar heat gain. I have no way to estimate those numbers. I'm fairly confident that solar heat gain is less than conductive heat loss, so the net should still be negative. I just don't know how much.
Also, the 1.08 in the formula assumes density of air at 70*F. So the air in my case will be cooler, more dense, the actual number would be greater than 1.08. That number is in the denominator in the equation, so it also means the actual CFM would be lower.
I suspect the actual infiltration rate in my house is closer to 200 than it is to 300, but that's only a SWAG at this point. It does seem pertinent to the current discussion tho.
Last edited: