BeGreen said:Bet you never figured on the entertainment factor of Hearth.com either. I know I didn't.
Ain't that the truth...
Oh, look! Phelps just won another Gold!
Chris
BeGreen said:Bet you never figured on the entertainment factor of Hearth.com either. I know I didn't.
unit40 said:I believe that part of the allure of burning with wood is the simplicity and self sufficiency, that harkens back to an earlier time. They didn't have no catalytic cumbusters and users manuals back then. Thats why I like my non-cat stove.
olive wood said:This page from Mr. Oyen's site is interesting. Usually his take on things seems quite knowledgeable - in fact I'm surprised he hasn't contributed to this thread.
(broken link removed to http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/hocats.htm)
unit40 said:I believe that it is illegal to run a cat stove in non-cat mode, unless you are doing so according to the users manual. I thought I read that in a VC manual I found on-line on their site. It might be a good idea to search on-line for a manual for the stoves you have in question and read them over to see for yourself what running a cat stove is all about.
Todd said:olive wood said:This page from Mr. Oyen's site is interesting. Usually his take on things seems quite knowledgeable - in fact I'm surprised he hasn't contributed to this thread.
(broken link removed to http://www.chimneysweeponline.com/hocats.htm)
Yeah, he's pretty much bias on non-cats. I took part in that debate a couple years ago and he was comparing my Fireview to an Hearthstone, but he compared the hearthstones cordwood efficiency to the Fireviews EPA efficiency. Not apples to apples. I would say that most people that complain about their cat stoves is due to operator error or bad install not the stove. And since a cat stove is a little more sensitive to proper maintenance and operation non cats are a better choice for dealers so they don't have to deal with the head aches from Joe know it all. This doesn't mean non cats are better or vice versa, both have their place and do the job.
joesat78 said:a small twist here...
Lets assume that there is a CAT stove with efficiency 75% and a NON-CAT stove with the same 75% efficiency. Which one would be a better buy? I assume NON-CATs are a little cheaper than the CAT stoves.
youngstr said:WD,
You're going to love that fireplace. We're going on 3 years with ours and are very happy. I burn 24/7 in the winter so I don't have to pay the propane man.....
Y
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.