Well I've been experimenting the last little while with this idea that as a newbie (I refer exclusively to myself here) one can start off the stove too fast, letting it get way too hot with the air wide open, getting it all fired up into amazing blazing glory and then shutting it down to watch the secondaries blazing in full technicolor glory. I would do this (previously) and then sit and fret because the stove started getting too hot heading towards 800+ and then I would start blowing fans on the stove top and wondering if I was going to have to open the door to slow down and cool off the "amazing secondaries."
The flip side to all of this is that running the stove too hot "up front" burns through the wood super fast and decreases burn times...... So lately I've been turning the air down step wise from a very early (for me) point, starting at around 300-350, but really once the flames are vigorous and starting to become frantic looking. My goal is to keep the main flames on the wood low and lazy while I progressively shut down the primary air; I've noticed that I don't necessarily see secondaries kicking off very early, but they do appear eventually when I've got the air almost completely shut down. Likewise, I don't see the stove top temperature climbing into the danger zone, north of 750, so much anymore, but then I'm pretty happy running between 550-650.
Unfortunately I can't comment of the effect on burn times, because I was running a smaller stove last winter and I've since upgraded to the magnificent Drolet Austral. But I'm pretty confidant that I'm zeroing in on some substantial burn times by running my stove this new way. It's not the last word on burn times by any means, but I'd say how you run your stove is a significant variable in the science of burn time efficiency.
Cheers,