Thanks Wolves1 for the welcome, and I'm glad you responded since you have been successful at the same endeavor.
The units come with the cat thermometer, so I have it and use it to constantly monitor and "learn" and know what's happening in the unit.
I have a question for you below, and here's my current thinking (flawed or not), just to bounce it off somebody who can probably assist...
Short chimney, equals slower draft, and harder starting when cold, requiring longer firing to get up to temp reducing wood left to burn "at temp", thus shorter burn times "at temp". "At temp" being cat engagement of 500 degrees or higher, since that's where the efficiency appears to be the greatest. (I realize burn time is essentially the start to hot to warmish cycle....)
I've noticed even when at temp (perhaps not long enough) closing the door, and subsequently closing the bypass (too soon probably) with draft control at max open tends to want to snuff out the fire and the flame dies down and out, and the temp drops. So the 30 mins "at temp" appears to be more critical in my case, and this would be consistent with a somewhat slower draft with my installation, I believe.
When I get it going moderately strong for a longer period before closing the bypass, to compensate, everything appears to work as expected. I get good flame and temp rise, but in my case I don't get a glowing cat until cat temp reaches about 1000 degrees. Once it drops below 1000, to 900 degrees for instance, with no flame reaching the cat, the glow in the cat is gone, and the temp slowly reduces from there over the next few hours. The heat output at 1000+ degrees, particularly with the blower, is impressive... the air exiting is around 350 degrees on low blower. (Note also I was careful to try to maintain a temp of 1000 -1100 degrees at that point, i.e. not let it get too high. Draft control was near 1/3 from minimum.)
I expect that the heat produced by the cat is important, and I've read the cat "creates heat" when catalyzing the smoke, but I can't help but wonder how much heat is produced by the cat when the temp is 500 versus when it's near 1000 and glowing? I *think* the cat glow is significant to the burn efficiency, since that is visible evidence that light-off and heat production is actually occurring.
I think you mentioned previously that your cat glowed at or shortly after, like within a minute or two, reaching 500 degrees.
My question:
Is it your experience that your cat begins glowing closer to 500 than to 1000 degrees?
We've only had just a few days/eves in the 30s over the last couple weeks, with only a few burns so far, and the next few days/eves are going to be unseasonably warm (like 50s/60s) for us here. So we will probably avoid another "cat glowing" burn for a while. The last one had us almost sweating... it was a little too warm for that kind of experiment, but hey, I was anxious, and I learnt a bit....
Somehow, I've lulled myself into thinking "cat glowing" is the target for peak efficiency, but it might not be. It might be for "peak heating", but for long burn efficiency the target may be closer to 500 with or without cat glow, not sure. Hoping you (or someone) can clarify...