After having both, I find that really hard to believe. Published number, not real life...The BTUs out on the Ashford is down by only %5 that of the Princess and she is a wife pleaser.
I’ve gone through the pretty for the wife phase. A few pretty Lopis, then the Ashford, now the Princess. We heat with wood primarily, Princess gets the wife vote in my house! She’s warmer than ever!The BTUs out on the Ashford is down by only %5 that of the Princess and she is a wife pleaser.
I’ve gone through the pretty for the wife phase. A few pretty Lopis, then the Ashford, now the Princess. We heat with wood primarily, Princess gets the wife vote in my house! She’s warmer than ever!
If you are trying to truly heat your home with a woodstove, then it really will come down to performance, not looks. A lot of wives want a good looking stove, but take no consideration for the performance and/or the amount of work involved with keeping the house warm. Ultimately it’s the husbands job to not only cut the wood, but then split, stack, and then bring it in to feed the stove... there are exceptions obviously. All too often though, it’s all on the guy who is making the exception on performance for the looks.. Not at my house!
We are warm!
7%? Hardly...Meh... I’m the one who wanted the good looking stove. Im not sure if my wife would know it if I swapped the stoves out tomorrow, unless she saw me in the act.
I’m still warm, and still burning a little oil in the process, but a Princess wouldn’t change that. Heck, I’m not sure a King would.
Point is, we all have different heating goals, and reasons for doing this. My Ashfords put a bigger smile on my face, than a plain steel box ever could, even if it is 7% bigger and hotter.
Good ol' Dingo!Let it be known that Princesses are Princess-approved. (Also Dingo-approved.)
View attachment 221192
Good ol' Dingo!
After having both, I find that really hard to believe. Published number, not real life...
That’s the case sometimes. Running low and slow is an awesome thing.Well, I guess the ashford is in for a workout tonight as it is certain to go below freezing and might even dip into the 20s for a few hours. This global warming stuff is ok by me, especially as I get older. Barely touched the wood pile this year but I do miss the snow. This year the stove has been on low and very low the whole time.
For my situation, and I suspect many others, the max BTU out number simply does not matter. It is the turndown that matters.
I might have to run a family/pet by the fire contest....Here's a real time Dingo Update (you may be shocked to see what she's up to). Photo taken less than a minute ago.
View attachment 221198
Please exclude goldfish. It could get ugly.I might have to run a family/pet by the fire contest....
Meh... I’m the one who wanted the good looking stove. Im not sure if my wife would know it if I swapped the stoves out tomorrow, unless she saw me in the act.
I’m still warm, and still burning a little oil in the process, but a Princess wouldn’t change that. Heck, I’m not sure a King would.
Point is, we all have different heating goals, and reasons for doing this. My Ashfords put a bigger smile on my face, than a plain steel box ever could, even if it is 7% bigger and hotter.
Let me participate in the contest. My three leggy pug.
And please cause there is nobody with non cat or different stove posting here now, we should not get to each other. Remember they all BK.
Are you running fans on the Ashfords or relying on natural convection?Please exclude goldfish. It could get ugly.
@webby3650, I know you've claimed a few times that the Princess is a substantially better heater than the Ashford 30, but I suspect that might be installation-specific. I mean, they're almost the same size, and have almost the same LHV and HHV efficiency. The big difference is that the Princess puts off more of its heat via radiation, and the Ashford puts off more of its heat via convection. You've said yourself, there is no magic here. The're both a metal box into which you place wood, and then release BTUs, with identical efficiencies
In my house, I can tell you for sure the Princess would fall flat, even larger Jotul Firelights couldn't do half the job of the Ashfords. That's because radiant heat is just wasted, in a house of uninsulated masonry construction. Perhaps the Princess just works better in your situation, or you find the higher fraction of radiation vs convection more pleasing (it is), but what's the numeric basis for it being a better heater?
I’m sure it is install specific, not many people are heating a solid stone wall mansion. Most people have an insulated structure they are trying to heat.Please exclude goldfish. It could get ugly.
@webby3650, I know you've claimed a few times that the Princess is a substantially better heater than the Ashford 30, but I suspect that might be installation-specific. I mean, they're almost the same size, and have almost the same LHV and HHV efficiency. The big difference is that the Princess puts off more of its heat via radiation, and the Ashford puts off more of its heat via convection. You've said yourself, there is no magic here. The're both a metal box into which you place wood, and then release BTUs, with identical efficiencies
In my house, I can tell you for sure the Princess would fall flat, even larger Jotul Firelights couldn't do half the job of the Ashfords. That's because radiant heat is just wasted, in a house of uninsulated masonry construction. Perhaps the Princess just works better in your situation, or you find the higher fraction of radiation vs convection more pleasing (it is), but what's the numeric basis for it being a better heater?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.