Lokidric
New Member
I brag about the 0.8 also, and my stove isn't even in yetPossibilities:
1. Any cat bypass will result in a dirtier burn. Not good. How much dirtier and if you care are different questions but as for me, I still inhale. I paid the big bucks to have and am proud of a stove that emits .8gph. I do brag about this.
2. Due to thermal movement, the cat might flop out of the frame and lean against the anti flame impingement plate. Bad things might happen.
3. Creosote might build up and lock the cat in place. It might, in the long term, cause corrosion of the holder.
4. An unanticipated bad thing might happen. BK has already spent the time and dollars to a prove a combustion system. For $13 why change it. BKVP is the authority here. He might enlighten us to the specifics as to why the gasket is %100 of the time to be used.
5. Having a gasketless cat makes cleaning/inspection somewhat easier. Good selling point for Condar. The pollution police might disagree tho.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee3c6/ee3c6b1a9fff418e32532145af5d4a56642cfbc8" alt="Smile :) :)"