ewdudley said:Nice! But I think you'd have to reverse the flow of both the load circulators as well. Would that be possible? Plus if you reversed the load pumps you'd be 'pumping away', which is sometimes necessary and always foolproof.infinitymike said:If I leave my OB and WG tees where they are and leave the load line where they are and flip the primary loop circ pump to flow clockwise, would that help.
Otherwise all the hot wood boiler water entering at 3:30 will mix with the load return flows at 5:30 and 6:30. Then most of the mixed flow goes out the top to the loads and the rest of the mixed flow returns to the boiler at 2:30. Mixing hot boiler water with load return water would be another version of the problem you have now, so not good.
Is there a benefit to move the supply and return lines of the 2 zones to be next to each other with closely spaced tees instead of at 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock?
Having them on opposite sides of the primary might work quite well in you situation.
Closely spaced tees will help guarantee that there won't be any unwanted parallel flows through idle loads, but I'm not convinced that is a problem you need to worry about in your system.
Also closely spaced tees will tend to prioritize your loads in the order that they pull from the primary loop, which could be an advantage, or not, depends on the type of loads and what your design goals are.
Hang in there, sounds like you may be able to get it straitened out without reworking any of the plumbing.
Cheers --ewd
See this is where I get confused and maybe you can help me.
The way I see it, is that If I flip the primary pump (clockwise flow) and move the load pumps to "pull away" off the top doesn't the hot wood boiler water still mix with the cooler returning water of the loads coming back in at the bottom any way.
And by the way how do you take a partial quote like you did and still make it have that greyish shading over it? do you cut all the text you don't want but leave the
at the beginning and end?