Hurricane said:I would take Oak and Locust.
CrawfordCentury said:Ash and red oak among what's available here. Though I'd lobby hard for a kindling exemption so I could keep kindling with white pine.
Hurricane said:I would take Oak and Locust.
Theoretical question: would you be perfectly happy to burn only one species if a botanist successfully cross-breeded a Loakust?
CarbonNeutral said:How well would it light?
Maybe a Ploakust - locust and oak in a pine wrapping..
basswidow said:here in northern jersey, seems to be alot of cherry. I like it. Seasons well and burns well.
!) Oak
2) Cherry
ikessky said:Hard maple and ironwood
ikessky said:Can't believe I'm the only one that brought up ironwood in 4 pages..........
And a Wisconsinite to boot!Der Fiur Meister said:Only because you posted before I turned the computer on.......
Nope. Not that much better. Just another 'good' one, like Oak.iceman said:kinda off topic... but i have a chance to get some black locust but the guy wants 180 a cord not split.... i am kinda thinking about it to try it because everyone seems to love it..... but i get red oak cut not split for 70-100 a cord (depends on oil, gas etc) but now many people offer red oak 150-170 c/s/d green.... so i am wondering if 180 is reasonable... is black locust THAT much better than red oak?
Der Fiur Meister said:ikessky said:Hard maple and ironwood
Amen to the Iron Wood. Coal that grows in the form of a tree. If not Hard Maple then Oak or Yellow Birch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.