Yeah, might be interesting to have a meeting with everyone in one room. Unless it got too heated, of course.
no pane said:agreed, a few others alsocountk said:Wet1, I'm curious why you seem to go to such great lengths debunking people on why they can't be heating efficiently, or with less cost using pellet stoves, compared to oil. It makes you sound as if you work for an oil company!
Sting said:no pane said:agreed, a few others alsocountk said:Wet1, I'm curious why you seem to go to such great lengths debunking people on why they can't be heating efficiently, or with less cost using pellet stoves, compared to oil. It makes you sound as if you work for an oil company!
WET1 is simply posting the math -- the fact that it doesn't add up is the point -- and that points me to think the fellow saying he heats his house with so little pellet energy vs traditional fuel -- well could he be a dealer trying to sell you the stove off his floor plan?
mandkj said:Well, you can either choose to believe me or not, your perogative. I know what it takes to heat my house for the winter with oil and pellets and no matter all the BTU theories and equations, my wallet is what I go by. As stated many times in this thread alone, everyone's situation is different. I live in a raised ranch (your square footage estimate was a little low but pretty close) and with a strategically placed ceiling fan to draw the warm air up, I can heat the whole house (less closed bedrooms) on a very low setting. I'm not sure what part of the country you live in but if you've chosen to go without pellets this year then you have every right to make that decision as do those of us that decide to buy early (unless you're offering to pay for mine of coarse, then that changes the whole equation.)
mandkj said:I think we'll all just have to agree to disagree. I must say, I'm somewhat surprised at the challenging attitude of some in this thread. I'm a fairly new member and have tried to contribute when I can but for future posts, I think I'll go back to my golden rule - when it comes to money or politics, keep it to myself.
Wet1 said:Guys, I honestly could care less how you heat your house, it's your money. What I do have a problem with is false, incomplete, or misinformation. We routinely get new folks that pass through here looking to save a buck or two and read some of these post and use this (mis)information as a basis for making significant investments. Dick and Jane then go out and spend $4000 or $5000 on a new stove, flue, hearth pad, installation, etc and then expect to save thousands a year on their heating bills... when in reality the payback is a VERY long time (if ever) given today's NG and oil prices.
I have no problem with someone saying they heat their 1650 sq ft home in New England all year with only 3 tons of pellets, plus the house is a toasty 5° warmer, and they are spending less on fuel on top of it. BUT, tell the complete story... such as three rooms in the house are now closed off and are not being heated, they are directly/indirectly supplementing the heat with something else (such as oil), far areas of the house aren't as warm, they bought their pellets two years ago at a significantly lower price than today's over priced pellet fuel, they are over estimating today's oil prices, the pellet stove is being compared to improperly operating antiquated central heating system, etc. Just disclose WHY it is the money is being saved, because in most areas NG and oil is significantly cheaper than pellets are if apples are being compared to apples.
As far as me working for an oil company, no I do not. But since I'm an engineer, have been burning pellets for nine years now, and own two pellet stoves (plus also have oil, NG, coal, K1, electric, and wood as my other fuel options), I do feel I have a pretty good handle on what's feasible and what's not. There's no doubt in my mind many of you can or do save money burning pellets, but the reason generally isn't because pellets are cheaper than oil today...
Wet1 said:Guys, I honestly could care less how you heat your house, it's your money. What I do have a problem with is false, incomplete, or misinformation. We routinely get new folks that pass through here looking to save a buck or two and read some of these post and use this (mis)information as a basis for making significant investments. Dick and Jane then go out and spend $4000 or $5000 on a new stove, flue, hearth pad, installation, etc and then expect to save thousands a year on their heating bills... when in reality the payback is a VERY long time (if ever) given today's NG and oil prices.
I have no problem with someone saying they heat their 1650 sq ft home in New England all year with only 3 tons of pellets, plus the house is a toasty 5° warmer, and they are spending less on fuel on top of it. BUT, tell the complete story... such as three rooms in the house are now closed off and are not being heated, they are directly/indirectly supplementing the heat with something else (such as oil), far areas of the house aren't as warm, they bought their pellets two years ago at a significantly lower price than today's over priced pellet fuel, they are over estimating today's oil prices, the pellet stove is being compared to improperly operating antiquated central heating system, etc. Just disclose WHY it is the money is being saved, because in most areas NG and oil is significantly cheaper than pellets are if apples are being compared to apples.
As far as me working for an oil company, no I do not. But since I'm an engineer, have been burning pellets for nine years now, and own two pellet stoves (plus also have oil, NG, coal, K1, electric, and wood as my other fuel options), I do feel I have a pretty good handle on what's feasible and what's not. There's no doubt in my mind many of you can or do save money burning pellets, but the reason generally isn't because pellets are cheaper than oil today...
mandkj said:Wet1 said:Guys, I honestly could care less how you heat your house, it's your money. What I do have a problem with is false, incomplete, or misinformation. We routinely get new folks that pass through here looking to save a buck or two and read some of these post and use this (mis)information as a basis for making significant investments. Dick and Jane then go out and spend $4000 or $5000 on a new stove, flue, hearth pad, installation, etc and then expect to save thousands a year on their heating bills... when in reality the payback is a VERY long time (if ever) given today's NG and oil prices.
I have no problem with someone saying they heat their 1650 sq ft home in New England all year with only 3 tons of pellets, plus the house is a toasty 5° warmer, and they are spending less on fuel on top of it. BUT, tell the complete story... such as three rooms in the house are now closed off and are not being heated, they are directly/indirectly supplementing the heat with something else (such as oil), far areas of the house aren't as warm, they bought their pellets two years ago at a significantly lower price than today's over priced pellet fuel, they are over estimating today's oil prices, the pellet stove is being compared to improperly operating antiquated central heating system, etc. Just disclose WHY it is the money is being saved, because in most areas NG and oil is significantly cheaper than pellets are if apples are being compared to apples.
As far as me working for an oil company, no I do not. But since I'm an engineer, have been burning pellets for nine years now, and own two pellet stoves (plus also have oil, NG, coal, K1, electric, and wood as my other fuel options), I do feel I have a pretty good handle on what's feasible and what's not. There's no doubt in my mind many of you can or do save money burning pellets, but the reason generally isn't because pellets are cheaper than oil today...
This whole response is quite offensive to me and its this type of arrogance that makes new members move on to somewhere else. I clearly stated that my burning season is 7 MONTHS, not 12. Why would I burn my stove all year long when, for several months, I need A/C? My numbers are from my burning season, again, clearly stated.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.