Gooserider said:I finally got caught up for a bit with the hearth postings, and was able to do a bit of rough drawing with my CAD program - and created these rough drawings to show a couple of generic hookups... As I find time, I will keep working on doing other designs along the same idea - you may see these drawings fairly often...
The house load, wood boiler, and fossil boilers are identical in both drawings, the only thing that changed is the way they are connected.
I think I have the wood boiler set up right (in one of the many ways it can be done) but there is nothing special about that boiler configuration, any way of hooking up a boiler that has a supply and return coming out would work. You could also substitute the pressure side of an OWB or Garn HX - the same idea applies.
Similarly, the house load is very generic, I just slapped a DHW indirect tank and a few different styles of radiation together to give the general idea...
In the first drawing the two heat sources are in parallel, and are essentially independent of each other. Whichever one is chosen on a call for heat turns on it's pump and circulates through the house load - Again this is very generic - the pumps could also be constantly running temperature controlled, the basic idea stays the same. The flow check in each pump (which could be a discrete component instead) prevents flow through the unused circuit. (In theory it might also be possible to have both heat sources running at the same time, though this would be unusual)
The second drawing uses closely spaced tees to connect the wood boiler into the fossil boiler - house load loop. The pump for the fossil boiler (P3) will run on any call for heat (or again could be an always on pump) so it MUST be able to run without firing the fossil boiler. As I understand the theory of closely spaced tees, you could actually put them any where on the loop that is a main trunk, not just where I have them drawn. If the storage is hot P2 also runs to inject hot water into the loop through the close spaced tees. If the storage isn't hot, the boiler fires and everything works like the wood side wasn't there.
Gooserider
Merry xmas Gooserider. Thanx fo all your time in helping me.
I will be going to pick my new eko 40 up around the 4th. of Jan.
I will be installing it in a detached shop . I will run 1-1/4" pex tubing from there to my lp boiler (roughly a 60' run).
My goal right now is to get it online asap. As my lp boiler costs about $300 a month to heat my place and I have no heat in my shop. I was used to paying nothing till I built this place,always burnt wood.
The 2nd. option you drew looks almost plug and play without the storage. I would be able to use all the control and p/p's from my existing system.
As far as efficiency, I think I would lose barely any as my lp boiler is allready in heated space .
The 1st. option also looks good too. I think I would be able to tee in just above the air extractor without too much hassle. but im just not sure about the control part.
Cheers Huff