Impressive. We have clay here and started hitting sand stone at 6' feet. I really wish all of my pipe was at 6' but that would cost me another 2k.
Yeah my HVAC guy told told me that I should have two tanks also. I was already over budget on the addition so I opted just for one tank. If I had to do it all over again, I would not get the DSH. The money that I spent on a DSH would of been used for a high end HPHW. If I lived in south and used a lot of A/C I would get a DSH.
The 2000 ft I mentioned included 100' out and back to the loop field. Loop field is 3 runs 300' out and back racetrack style, so 1800 ' total there. There are some things I dislike about where I live (like winter) but our soil for geo is not one of them. No problem getting to 7' with a big excavator. Wet clay soil with water moving through, perfect for heat transfer.
A couple of points on geo systems, though. A DSH is not just cost effective in the south. The same argument could be used for a HPWH. The heat has to come from somewhere. In the case of the HPWH it comes from the heat in the building, with the DSH, it comes from heat off the compressor. Both types of water heating are a load in the winter, and free heat in the summer. A DSH, if set up right is more efficient, so one could argue a better investment. I'm not totally convinced of that one, as the HPWH also has the benefit of doing some dehumidification, which could make it the winner in the long term. FWIW, the second tank for the DSH is often just a 50 gal electric water heater without the elements hooked up, not a big cost for the DSH to run efficiently.
As far as efficiency of a geo system goes, you can't really make any guestimates of efficiency based on what the system should put out in terms of heat. GEO systems are dependent totally on the quality of the installation. A couple of small changes in design can cripple an otherwise very efficient geo unit. The only way to check things and come up with a number is by doing some testing and finding out what the actual heat of extraction of the unit is. This number can be compared to a chart the factory includes in the owner's manual to see how well it is operating. To actually do the testing, you need to know 5 things...current and voltage, which you can measure at the panel, incoming loop temp, outgoing loop temp, and flow through the loop. This will measure everything, including pumping, blower, etc. It does not take into consideration duct losses, just the efficiency of the unit itself. The link below will link you to a document that explains how to do the testing. It's not too hard to do.
(broken link removed to http://www.geoconnectionsinc.com/bookstore/forced_air_efficiency_measurement.html)
I spent quite a bit of time playing with my system one winter and found a couple of surprises. Contrary to popular belief, second stage is just about as efficient as first stage, so I never let it concern me when second stage is on. A 2 stage heat pump is made to use both stages when it is sized correctly. To size a heat pump so second stage doesn't get used means you are paying more to run an over sized system most of the time. Even aux heat, when it runs, is not that much of a hit, so long as it's not running too much. Most of your heat is still coming from second stage operation, and the aux strip is just supplementing that. You aren't running at COP=1, at that point, but probably closer to COP=2. Over an hour period, aux may just cycle a small part of that, so the actual COP over a longer period is still much higher. That said, excessive aux use due to a problem with the heat pump system will quickly run your electric bill up.
On the dehumidifier, I tried things like putting it on a timer to try to save money (we have separate day/night electric rates) but found that was pretty useless if I wanted it to actually work. I've just accepted it as one of the energy hogs I live with. A couple of aquariums are another. The horses are gone now, so the stock heater is history.